• Why Us
  • Politics
  • Speaking
    • Social Media Keynote Speaker
    • Social Media Training
  • Consulting
  • About
    • About
    • Testimonials
    • Portfolio
    • Press and Media
    • Upcoming Events
  • Blog +
    • Blog
    • Podcast: Hello Merge Tag
    • Podcast: Step Up Your Social
    • Newsletter: Free Digital Tools
    • Digital Tools For Campaigns
  • Let’s Talk
  • Menu Menu
  • Why Us
  • Politics
  • Speaking
    • Social Media Keynote Speaker
    • Social Media Training
  • Consulting
  • About
    • About
    • Testimonials
    • Portfolio
    • Press and Media
    • Upcoming Events
  • Blog +
    • Blog
    • Podcast: Hello Merge Tag
    • Podcast: Step Up Your Social
    • Newsletter: Free Digital Tools
    • Digital Tools For Campaigns
  • Let’s Talk

Tag Archive for: Political Strategy

Posts

Hello Merge Tag, Politics

Turning Followers Into Voters with Erika Harrison of Black Girls Who Brunch and Claire Shorall of Sway | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 55

Turning followers into voters with Erika Harrison of Black Girls Who Brunch and Claire Shorall of Sway

 

“Don’t join my cool kids club if you’re not coming to vote. This club votes.”

Erika Harrison built Black Girls Who Brunch as a food blog. Over ten years, it became a platform where she talks about politics, policy, and culture with an ever-growing audience.

She recently started using a tool called Sway to do something most content creators never attempt: turning her followers into an organized voting bloc.

The results have been striking. In the primary, her Sway group had 83% turnout. In two races, her group’s votes exceeded the margin of victory.

She’s using Sway to help people navigate Harris County’s 100+ item ballot. She’s moving people to vote in down-ballot races they didn’t know existed. She’s doing her part to change how elections work in Texas.

Claire Shorall, Sway’s founder, joined her to talk about what happens when you give creators the tools to actually organize voters — not just talk to them.

Key Takeaways:

  • You don’t need a massive platform to move elections. You need an organized one. Erika’s 2,400 followers with high intent beat millions of passive followers.
  • The backend data matters. Knowing exactly where your voters live (down to state house district) changes what you can do.
  • Down-ballot races are where organizing can really move the needle. Most people don’t pay attention. If they know the name, they vote differently.

If you’ve got a platform — whether it’s 500 followers or 500,000 — Sway was built for you. Learn more about turning your followers into voters with Sway.

 

Listen to the full episode right here, or wherever you stream podcasts.

If you prefer video, you can also watch our full conversation:

Big thanks to our sponsors:

Civic Shout. Learn more about the great work they’re doing to help Democratic campaigns and progressive nonprofits build their lists ethically at civicshout.com/partners.

Run! Political Campaign Websites Made Easy. The website builder that builds movements and powers campaigns. Learn more at designedtorun.com.

 

Episode Transcript

This transcript was automatically generated and has not been copy-edited. While it can serve as a helpful guide to our conversation, it may contain errors or omissions. For the most accurate representation, we recommend listening to (or watching) the full episode.

Josh Klemons: Erica Harrison is an attorney in Houston, Texas, who spent the bulk of her career working in diversity, equity, and inclusion, supporting communities in higher education and corporate America. In her spare time, she created the blog Black Girls Who Brunch, originally intended to h uh highlight the vibrant uh Houston culinary scene with special attention to black businesses. In the 10 years since its inception, Black Girls Who Brunch has grown a vast audience made up primarily of black professional women. The blog’s topics have grown to include travel and lifestyle as well as politics. One of the tools in her digital toolkit to mobilize voters in Texas and beyond is called Sway.

 

Josh Klemons: Sway, a nonpartisan platform that lets people organize voting blocks, was built by Claire Sher Cherel, sorry, Cheryl, is that it? Yes. Got it. Um, I invited Eric and Cla on the pod today to talk about how all of us can do more to turn our audiences online into voters. So, thank you both so much for joining uh the pod today. Uh, Erica, you started Black Girls Who Brunch as a food blog. When did politics over Is it fair to say politics overcame uh food as your focus? and talk about the process. How did that

Erika Harrison: And I always tell people at some point things are going to calm down.

Josh Klemons: happen?

Erika Harrison: I can go back to food. And I always like I want to go back to food.

Josh Klemons: One day.

Erika Harrison: But um I one day I really feel like when I think back to it,

Josh Klemons: One

Erika Harrison: I I really can’t think of like one moment.

Josh Klemons: day.

Erika Harrison: But I started the blog 11 years now.

Erika Harrison: And I’ve always kind of put put in like a little bit more in-depth things. Food is inherently political in a lot of ways, too. So I always gave my audience something more in depth to chew on.

Josh Klemons: Sure.

Erika Harrison: So it wasn’t just like this place is cute. It was like this place is cute. And you know, the owners also had a lawsuit and this that and the third. So people were kind of used to coming to me for more detailed analysis about different things. And then over time I used to just put it in my stories and I just would share like you know my thoughts on the impeachment trial and things like that. And over time it became where people started asking me questions and really wanting to um and and really wanting me to kind of explain things. And I think the big I I’ve shifted a bit and then I always go back. I shift and always go back. This last time I’ve had to do a hard shift after I kind of shifted in 2024 when Kla Harris was uh became the nominee and I haven’t looked back since.

Erika Harrison: I if you scroll through I I’ll throw a food thing in there occasionally. But but that’s kind of how it happened. It just it kind of happened over time and the takeover really did happen probably 2024 where I haven’t made the hard shift back to food just yet. But this moment to me requires people that have knowledge and are able to communicate well to to audiences. It requires us to to um like this is our our role in the movement. You know how everyone kind of had their role in the civil rights movement. That’s how I see myself as a person that’s can communicate what’s happening in digestible ways. And so that’s part of why I’ve really been doing this uh you know for the most part consistently since then. So, but at some point you’re going to look up like five years from now after we have fought back against all the crazy and black girls to brunch will be a food blog again

Josh Klemons: I I mean may we all live in a world where you don’t have to talk about politics on the internet,

 

Claire Shorall: What’s

Erika Harrison: fully.

Josh Klemons: right? Like that’s the goal, right? For all of us, I think. Um well I I was very interested because like obviously in 24 like the whole like Trump podcasting thing it wasn’t about the podcasts it was about the audience and like what he was doing was going to non-political places to reach people who weren’t interested in politics. So the idea of leading so I I very much on social like lead with politics. It’s just like I work in politics. That’s who I am. But what I love is people who don’t lead with politics necessarily, but like it’s there. And yeah, the idea of like food being political obviously like already was a context, but like you know somebody can find your page be like I like brunch and then all of a sudden they’re listening to you know you talk about the guminatorial race in Texas. So, you know, it’s like a cool way to bring people in who might if you were like black girls who care about politics might turn people off, but like instead you’re bringing folks in in a different way.

Josh Klemons: And I don’t know, it sounds like that wasn’t necessarily intentional so much as just kind of like

Erika Harrison: So the the framework of how I think about Black Girl Brunch because I’m an attorney,

Josh Klemons: happened.

Erika Harrison: I’ve always been a magnet for other black professional women. So like, oh, she’s a lawyer. Like, you know, she does the things that we do. And so I’ve always kind of had that audience. And this is how I think about it. Black Girls Who Brunch is about what black women would talk about at brunch. So if you sit at a table with a whole bunch of black professionals, like the tables that I was set in and for my birthday in Morocco, I was 12 of us in Morocco for my birthday trip. What I talk about on my page is what I talk about with my friends who are super intelligent women who I just admire. And so I think what I this is my page in some ways in many ways is a reflection of the conversations I have with my family, my friends, my uh you know co-workers and all of that.

 

Erika Harrison: It it it kind of is that and that’s how I think about it. So it’s who what black women who brunch it’s what they do. And uh and so now I feel like I’ve gotten to the point where I I’m my page is more preaching to the choir kind of page.

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Erika Harrison: It’s not really the people I I haven’t I think I’ve moved past sneaking in the politics in the vegetables, you know, like sneaking in vegetables. I think it’s kind of moved to like it’s it’s okay, we come here for politics. I think it’s kind of moved to that point. But initially that that is one of the the the benefits of it is you are kind of sneaking in political content into people’s feeds who wouldn’t normally follow a political

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: page.

Claire Shorall: Oh.

Josh Klemons: And I mean even that idea though like the idea of like you know leading with it like this morning I did a Tik Tok and an Instagram post about the fact that Wisconsin has a gubernatorial race coming up in a few weeks but like hey there’s also a lot of other things on on the ballot and the people who follow my content want to talk politics.

Josh Klemons: Like they know anybody who knows me knows it’s like going to be political. It is wild how many people thanked me for posting about this cuz they didn’t know, you know? So it’s like even the folks who are following it aren’t following it the way I’m following it where I do this for a living or you’re following it like as an attorney who’s like spending their time creating content. So it’s like even if we’re preaching to the choir, the pre the choir is not necessarily like it’s our job to help make sure the choir knows the story too, right? Like because they’re, you know, who are we without the choir, you know?

Erika Harrison: We’re preaching to the back row of the choir who may be coming up sometimes and not paying attention. That’s that is that is true.

Josh Klemons: Exactly.

Erika Harrison: True. And so there’s like nuance and layers that I bring into people. And some people don’t always have the capacity to pay attention until it gets closer to election time.

Josh Klemons: For

Erika Harrison: And so um like right now I’m building capacity about some things that are happening locally in Houston when it comes to

 

Josh Klemons: sure.

Erika Harrison: our our mayors up for re-election. And so I’m building people’s capacity and like dribbling out,

Josh Klemons: Mhm.

Erika Harrison: okay, this is what he’s doing. So when it’s time to vote again, I need you all to remember this. So um but yeah, because they can’t pay attention the way that I do at this point. It’s like it’s part of the job.

Josh Klemons: Um, and Claire, we’re going to bring Sway in in a minute, but Erica, do you think um is it different building trust around political organizing than it is around like cultural organizing in your opinion? Do you think about it differently or is just it was such a natural shift? And I love the way you frame that. this is less a story about like politics and it’s more a story of like here is the soundtrack of my life that I’m bringing you into like this is what we talk about at brunch so like just join us you

Erika Harrison: Yeah. Which is why my friends always laugh because they’re like,

Josh Klemons: know

Erika Harrison: “No, like this is who she is. if you if we’re all hanging out, this is what we’re talking about, you know. Um,

Josh Klemons: right

Erika Harrison: and he so many of my friends are lawyers because we we attract we attract each other,

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: black women lawyers. And so I even one of my friends, she’s always like, I was waiting for you to get on there and explain what happened with this lawsuit. And I was like, you you also are a lawyer. You can read as well. She’s like, yeah, but I knew you were going to explain it. Um, but no, I I don’t really think about it from that kind of strategic standpoint. Uh, and I know people are often surprised that I’m not as strategic when it comes to my content and how I think about the kind of, you know, community that I’ve built. I think I’ve just always shown up in an authentic way and authenticity, you know, it it we connect in that way and that’s just kind of how it’s it’s been.

 

Erika Harrison: So, I haven’t really thought about it that way, but that’s interesting. I may need to outline like how does how do those things play into each other, you know? But, uh,

Josh Klemons: Well, if for no other reason,

Erika Harrison: but yeah.

Josh Klemons: just because I know for me, so you want to live in a world where nobody’s talking politics, which I would love as well. I want to live in a world where there’s a hundred other people doing what I’m doing on TikTok in Wisconsin. Like, I’m telling everyone, I’m like, you should do this, too. Like, it doesn’t just have to be me. So, the more I can kind of like try to show that there’s a path like people are looking and I don’t have a massive platform, but like I have a platform. It is wild to me that there’s not more people doing what I’m doing because what I’m doing is not complicated.

Erika Harrison: Okay.

Josh Klemons: It’s hard, but it’s not complicated. It’s like I keep up with the news for a living.

 

Claire Shorall: Yes.

Josh Klemons: So, like I’m just telling people what I’m seeing online. And yeah, I would like there’s no competition here. I’m not making a living doing this. It’s like I do it solely because I believe in the work. I have to be joined by more. And I’m not saying I’m alone, but like there’s not enough of us. Lord knows. Uh specifically in Wisconsin. I mean, nationally there’s tons of people, but like for Wisconsin specific, it’s it’s less. So Claire, you first of all, give us the sort of like 30 second overview. Like what is Sway and what problem were you trying to solve when you like rolled out this

Claire Shorall: Yeah. So,

Josh Klemons: platform?

Claire Shorall: Sway is a voting group platform where people vote together and actually win elections. So, Erica’s case in point, but the problem we were trying to solve, it’s layered. I think one thing that we knew was voting groups work. There are national organizations like the NRA for example that puts out a scorecard and gets their people to the polls and now 1% of the population writes the gun laws for 100% of the country.

 

Claire Shorall: So like this mechanism of organization it’s tried and true. We were just trying to democratize access to it. Um but more notably uh I worked on the 2024 election and I saw two things. So, one, we were doing total disservice to the down ballot candidates. Partially because I was in Pittsburgh and a bunch of people came in from out of state and they were definitely there for Kamla. Thank you. Love you. Appreciate you. But like they weren’t learning the intricacies of what was happening on the ground. I was doing for field organization in my hometown. So, I knew our local state rep candidate who’s awesome. Uh she’s one of these target district people to watch. Uh her name’s Hadley Hos. She’s amazing. But like other people who were coming in, they were obviously there for the top of the ticket and that just it like hurt my heart. Like we’d often send out volunteers with the wrong lit. So that was one thing.

 

Claire Shorall: I think the other thing is that like you know I was part of a 9 million doornocking operation and I cannot say with my full chest that it was more important than one three-hour episode with Rogan. And like that was really painful. And you know I think I just saw us leaving a lot of relational trust on the table. And so what sway is is essentially like a partle or like a evite for the election. I’m saying, “Okay, Erica, like I’m in a parasocial relationship with you. I understand your values. Uh I understand like how you come at things and I know that you know everything about Harris County. Uh instead of me doing all this research, I’m just going to join your voting group.” In turn, you’re going to have leverage because candidates are going to know that people follow you. uh like you know there’s a there’s an actual cotification and aggregation of like Erica’s influence in this way that’s slightly different than how it exists on an Instagram or on a Tik Tok because like these are actual voters who are saying yeah send me that voter guide right anyway uh I saw that relational trust as a currency that was being underutilized and definitely not cashed in on um and tech is incredible at doing certain things and this is just like a way for anyone to organize and make voting feel like a group project.

 

Josh Klemons: And so just to clarify,

Claire Shorall: Anyway,

Josh Klemons: I mean like obviously like I dug into the project. Um like when you say voting group, it’s like Erica lays out who she’s voting for and like is essentially advocating that her people should go and vote for them as well. How is that? Correct.

Claire Shorall: Yeah, I I would say the advocation is uh it depends on who the actual

Josh Klemons: Lost my network.

Claire Shorall: leader is. In Erica’s case, and Erica, you you’ve forgotten more than I know about like how you’re coming to this work. So, um but like people are saying, “Hey, you know, I’m a leader for X, Y, and Z reasons.” And they are influential folks. like there’s a reason that people will join their groups and then they go and they make a slate of the people that they’re voting for and it’s a resource really like advocating for people to vote a certain way you know some people are more forceful about that than others but for the most part I would say uh

 

Josh Klemons: so explain the tech behind it.

Erika Harrison: Okay.

Josh Klemons: Like the idea is it’s a voter guide thing. Literally, Erica says who she’s voting for so that she she is essentially endorsing canes in her

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: area so that folks who live in Harris County or wherever can say, “Great, I want to support them.” Erica, you sort of made my face. Is that not how you think about it? Even if it is how Clare thinks about it,

 

Erika Harrison: I I don’t like I don’t like to call it an endorsement.

Josh Klemons: or did I misread that?

Erika Harrison: It’s it’s Lissa’s recommendation.

Josh Klemons: Okay. What do you call it?

Erika Harrison: This is a recommendation. My goal is to make people in help people be informed voters. And so if my resource is a tool that you can use to help help you get you started, that’s how I like to see it. Do I know people, especially my good friends, are going to print what I say and walk down there and just just vote with what how I voted? Yes. But they also, you know, trust this currency. They also know me and they know the kind of research that I do and they know more behind the scenes stuff. But if a person’s like, I don’t know, good. I want you to question it. I want you to say, why would she pick this person over that person? And I want you to go do your own research. And if you end up picking different than me, that’s good.

 

Erika Harrison: I actually love when people message me and say like, “Okay, I used your list. I made a different choice for county judge.” Great. Because that meant that you went and made an informed decision. So that’s so it’s not like I I do like the idea of like, you know, coming behind certain candidates I really believe in. But more than anything, I like it to be a a resource that you can use to make you a more informed voter. And if you go and pick everything different than me, it’s a little contrarianism, but you know, um there’s there’s a it made it challenged you.

Josh Klemons: We’re talking primaries.

Erika Harrison: It made you Yes.

Josh Klemons: They can make they can make different choice in the primaries, not in the general.

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: Right.

Erika Harrison: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: I just

Claire Shorall: Although I will I will say if somebody is making different choices than Erica across the board

Erika Harrison: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: didn’t

Claire Shorall: then they probably shouldn’t be in Erica’s voting group because in the interim Erica has lobbying leverage because uh she is saying hey I have this many voters in your jurisdiction and so uh I would we don’t track and obviously you never know how somebody acts in the actual polls and I would say even for my own sake I use sway in uh in our primary here in California and there were you know insurance commissioner I don’t know anyway there were people who put these like very

 

Claire Shorall: thoughtful writeups in their guide um and I might have had five people recommending one person and then one person recommending somebody else and I went with that one person because I was so compelled by their description so We can’t even really say like ah they had five recommendations for this one person and one for another and so we can like you know just guess that they went Yeah.

Josh Klemons: It’s not quantitative like there’s a qualitative component,

Claire Shorall: Yeah. Yeah.

Josh Klemons: right?

Claire Shorall: We agency is agency and consent are like two of our biggest pillars at Sway. So go and do what you want in in the voting booth. But I would say like this idea of somebody joining Erica’s group and then being like nah I’m not taking anything

Erika Harrison: This is true.

Claire Shorall: doesn’t really make sense.

Erika Harrison: They probably should go. They probably should go make their own group if they’re doing that.

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: They really should.

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: I do try to tell people I’m always like if somebody one thing I tell people if people ask you for

 

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: ballot recommendations which a lot of like if you are even a a smidge politically active or that people know that you go vote they will ask you for recommendations and so if you are that person I’m like just make a sway well

Josh Klemons: Yep.

Erika Harrison: I only have like three people I said but those three people they send they sent it to others as well make a way makes it much easier for

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: you. Other big thing too that we’ll probably get to, but I just want to note here. I live in Harris County, Texas. We have the longest ballot in the country. There were there are a hundred items on our ballot.

Josh Klemons: Oh my Oh my goodness.

Erika Harrison: Hundred. And so, um,

Josh Klemons: Literally,

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: there’s a hundred things on your ballot.

Claire Shorall: No, literally.

Erika Harrison: over a hundred over a hundred. We have because

Claire Shorall: Wait, Josh,

Josh Klemons: Oh my goodness.

Claire Shorall: can I also say one more thing?

Erika Harrison: we

Claire Shorall: When I met Erica the first time, and we can share more about that story, but Erica was like, “Okay, so there are hundred things on the ballot, and we can’t take our phones into the polls.” And so our killer feature in Texas was a print to PDF.

Erika Harrison: That’s what did

Josh Klemons: Oh, like you could Whoa.

Erika Harrison: it

Josh Klemons: Yeah, that’s W. I mean, yeah. How do you even remember a hundred things on your ballot?

Claire Shorall: You

Josh Klemons: That’s wild, you

Claire Shorall: don’t.

Erika Harrison: that so so and okay so let’s tell I want to tell a story about how I met Claire because we’re sitting here so

Josh Klemons: know?

Erika Harrison: I get it this is a food blogger Claire hosts an event in Houston to introduce content creators to

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: Sway they think that that this can be a way to activate Sway I don’t even know what this app is but they they have at this this place called

Josh Klemons: Sure.

Erika Harrison: Margo Club. I love Margo Club. It’s a very nice restaurant in Houston.

Erika Harrison: So, I go because it’s Margo Club. So, I get there. Usually, I’m a very wellressearched person. I don’t walk into events and not know what’s going on. I get there and they’re like, “You probably have pulled up the app already.” I hadn’t. I was like, “Okay, what does this app do?” So, I’m sitting here letting them like I am I come in blind.

Josh Klemons: He

Erika Harrison: I know nothing. They start talking about what the app does. And one of the examples they had on their like a little card there was uh Christian Miny who was a candidate that we that I strongly support and all his different races.

Josh Klemons: Mhm.

Erika Harrison: And so they start talking I was like oh wait I need that be because for me the big thing was the backend data. The fact that I could see if I had a hundred people in my group, I could see what districts they were in. And in Houston, Harris County, we’ve got like seven or eight congressional districts that come through Harris County.

Erika Harrison: They’ll get like a little tip of it and go out to Brazoria or whatever,

Josh Klemons: #jerrymandering.

Erika Harrison: but I can Yes. So, I can me knowing,

Josh Klemons: Yeah,

Erika Harrison: okay, I’ve got 10 people in that district. This interview does make sense was super helpful. So, that’s kind of how we how we get started.

Josh Klemons: that’s cool.

Erika Harrison: But we’re talking and um I said, Claire, we can’t bring our phones into the polling location. She said,

Josh Klemons: That’s

Erika Harrison: “What?” We’re t we’re talking like two three weeks before election and they

Josh Klemons: wild.

Erika Harrison: push out a feature where you can download and print your ballot. That was lifechanging for like that. Like that’s really what got Sway activated in Houston because we it’s so long. And so then so what happens is for us, one of the reasons why Sway is me even great for us in the general, we have a extreme undervote because our ballots are so long and the bulk of what’s on our ballots that’s really long are

 

Josh Klemons: Oops.

Erika Harrison: judges. We we’ll have probably seven like it’s like 60 judges on our ballot. It’s crazy. So from like Supreme Court, state Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and then our local courts. So people are like, I don’t know who these people are. The straight party ticket thing. We can’t just vote Democrat and go or Republican and go. So people will say, I am a Democrat, but I’ve seen these things on the news about judges. I don’t want to vote for the wrong judge, so I’m going to skip that race. So our undervote is is really harmful in Harris County when it comes to judges and it has been had a huge impact on black women judges. So my fellow black women in the of the bar, women I know, I respect, they have lost races by like 300 votes simply because people are not voting all the way down because they don’t feel informed. And so even going into the general, I’m going to be able to really push sway.

Erika Harrison: You were worried about those those judges. I’ve got all the judges on here. Just take the list and go on there and feel confident that you’re making a smart decision on who you pick for a judge

Josh Klemons: That is wild. Um, talk about the Texas, the land of uh personal freedom and whatnot, saying you can’t bring your phone into the ballot box. That’s like that’s some straight big government b*******, man. That’s wild.

Erika Harrison: with ballots that long with limits.

Josh Klemons: Uh let let me hear.

Erika Harrison: Yeah.

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: I mean that’s not good for anybody. Like it’s not Yeah. I mean obviously that is a different story that we’re talking about, but like seems bad for Republicans and Democrats. I don’t know. That’s just a wild decision to make. Uh Wisconsin used to have um single party voting. You could say vote for all Dems or Republicans and Republicans got

Josh Klemons: Okay. Um, so let me Okay. Uh Claire,

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: you talked the difference between the paras social relationship and the relational. I’m very interested. Do you see Sway as a relational tool? It feels like kind of traditional to me, but like you’re feeling it like and honestly the way Erica discussed it was more relational. She’s able to like look up which districts her friends are in and talk to her. Was that part of your intention or is that just something that’s kind of come about as folks have started using

Claire Shorall: Well,

Josh Klemons: it?

Claire Shorall: it’s interesting. Um, and Erica, you’ve said some really like fascinating feedback about this. When someone joins a voting group, their default is anonymous.

Claire Shorall: They can decide to make themselves public, but this is not like a traditional CRM. Erica can’t know exactly who her 2,000 followers are on Sway,

Josh Klemons: Got

Claire Shorall: but what he can do is say she’s,

Josh Klemons: it.

Claire Shorall: you know, canvasing for state rep 117, right? She can go into her Sway, select state rep 117 and only text the people who are registered in that jurisdiction. So, um I mean obviously I come from a relational organizing background. there. I think relational organizing in general works, but this is a slightly different dynamic in the sense that like identity is not as central. It’s more uh messaging the right people and then people have control over how much information they’re sharing with the

Josh Klemons: Um,

Claire Shorall: leader.

Josh Klemons: I’m curious because I’ve worked with relational programs where you can see that people follow you so that you can know like did they reach, you know, did they open my email? Did they see my text? Was that a choice you made to maintain privacy or did you just think it was since we’re talking about folks with like big platforms like Erica, she didn’t need to necessarily like dig into the weeds?

Josh Klemons: Why? Why did you not make it to where Erica could see the 2400 people following her and like figure out who they could be voting for? I’m

Claire Shorall: Yeah. No, this was definitely a choice. Um,

Josh Klemons: curious.

Claire Shorall: a lot of our initial product decisions wanted to mimic the ballot box in the sense that like you have agency, you have privacy. The other thought here is that if I’m an individual and I’m following Erica, like I might really trust Erica, for example, on judicial races in Harris County, um, but I might have, these are all hypothetical because this is not true. I might be a homeowner and have like different thoughts about property rights or something. I, you know, um, and I might follow somebody who has like a rather different tilt on that, right? um for the individual who is coming to Sway and following folks, they can kind of put together a basket of leaders that they are following and make essentially what amounts to a micro party for themselves. Now, they can only cast one vote ultimately, but they’re basically like giving leverage to each of these leaders depending on the the topics or the values that they espouse and saying like, “Yeah, actually I’m going to put some leverage behind this.” This makes the pure count.

 

Claire Shorall: Like, you know, if I have 10 things on a Yimi group and 10 things on a something that’s counter.

Josh Klemons: Something else.

Claire Shorall: Yeah. then like you know uh it’s probably not actually that that each of these sides are getting 10 votes. But that being said, when someone’s joining, like they have a lot of control about how they show up on sway. The backend data Erica still gets, but she gets in the aggregate. So, she is able to see, which this is incredible. Like, this is a mind-blowing stat. Erica had 83% turnout in the primary. Like,

Josh Klemons: That’s self-reported like folks who follow how do Oh,

Claire Shorall: no, no,

Josh Klemons: you’re able to connect to the voter file.

Claire Shorall: it

Josh Klemons: So, you know that 83% of So, there’s 2400 people follow Erica and you know that 83% of them voted in the primary. Okay. Yeah, that is pretty awesome.

Claire Shorall: Wait.

Erika Harrison: It was less than it was less than 24 during the primary,

Claire Shorall: And

Erika Harrison: but and then and then I had to I told people I said,

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Erika Harrison: “Don’t join my cool kids club if you’re not coming to vote. This this club votes.

Josh Klemons: Hell yeah.

Erika Harrison: Don’t don’t don’t my number.

Josh Klemons: I love

Claire Shorall: you said you were you were like 12 or 15 times the turnout.

Josh Klemons: that.

Claire Shorall: your group was 12 or 15 times the turnout like than the average in the the state average in the primary or sorry in the runoff. So like yeah, you might be disappointed by that,

Erika Harrison: What?

Claire Shorall: but but realistically you’re crushing

Erika Harrison: My runoff number went down and I was floored. It was like 30%.

Claire Shorall: it.

Erika Harrison: I said, “Don’t be in my group ruining my numbers.” But it we we had to wait for for a day of voting. And it went up a bit. But Clara’s like, “This is really good.” I said, “Is it?” They didn’t go vote in the

Claire Shorall: Sorry. Yeah.

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Claire Shorall: Yeah. Yeah. I don’t like one of the things we talk about at Sway is making voting feel like a group project because it is and like that feedback loop was not there. So even if you can’t like you know go into Sway look up Sally Sue’s phone number and text Sally Sue like you have a sense of how many people got out and Erica can send as like early voting starts in October y’all were at 15%. We’re at 30%. Like we like it’s a drive to 100. And then what’s really cool, like honestly kind of the reason I’m so stoked about what we’re doing is that in the primary multiplied by the turnout, Erica’s group exceeded the margin in two races. So you can look at that person and be like, “You’re ours.

Erika Harrison: I have and the two people that that were I I have personally told them that told them

Claire Shorall: We brought you across the line.

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: that one of them I knew like I he we went to the same college uh uh different times but but we are both Missou alums and so I really supported his campaign so it was really exciting to see him on that list and one of the other people I didn’t know her but she ended up winning by three votes.

Erika Harrison: The the original number we had was like six. So that’s other thing I the down ballot thing.

Josh Klemons: Wow.

Erika Harrison: And then to her point about the the um the messages because we we got this redistricting and the gerrymandering and all that that happened Texas people don’t know what districts they’re in.

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: So a good example if you guys have been following what happened with ICE here in Houston, Lorenzo Tagado Rujo was murdered on the east end of Houston. This area is a democratic stronghold. like very um historic Latino neighborhoods. This area has been redistricted and moved into a district that could be rep be represented by a Trump MAGA candidate. And people don’t know that. But I actually had met the person who is running, the Democrat that’s running for that seat, Leticia Gutierrez, and I was like, I’ve got to interview you because I don’t think people know that they’re in your new district. They have no idea what’s at stake. And so, um, interviewed her and then I went on my I went to Sway before I interviewed her and said, “Hey, I went and filtered it for District 9. You’re in District Nine. You’re in the new nine.

Erika Harrison: This is your candidate. I’m interviewing her today. Uh, uh, you may miss it, but I’ll put it on YouTube. Go watch it so you know what’s at stake.” And so that’s been really helpful as well, just to kind of like really be specific. Um, our state house seats, most people don’t know who their state house reps are. In Texas, we have this goal to flip 14 seats in order to take over the state house.

Josh Klemons: Yep.

Erika Harrison: That’s going to change so much of what the Republicans are able to do in the state. And so we have this goal. What I’ve been doing, I I’ve gone if I see a little clip about a state house rep, I’ll message their people, hey, this is your state house rep. This or this is a candidate’s running. Did you know that? Because they don’t know. So, I’m saying look for this name. So, the first time that you see this name won’t be when you’re pulling up your ballot or when you or when you go vote.

Erika Harrison: It’ll be because I sent you a text message saying Mon’nique Scott is your is your rep. And Monica Scott, she went viral for a a speech she gave during our convention here in Texas. I sent that clip to the the 30 people in my swag group that live in her district because I thought it was

Josh Klemons: So yeah, I Love that.

Erika Harrison: powerful.

Josh Klemons: So you’re a that’s just like a really cool application and b so you’re able to message your entire like you can message your whole voter group or just folks in a specific district broken down by congressional or state house. Um are they able to reply?

Erika Harrison: No,

Josh Klemons: Is it or is it monoirectional? Because it’s anonymous.

Erika Harrison: not at

Josh Klemons: I would think it would be hard for them to like respond but you’re able to like share that and then you can also say I

Erika Harrison: all.

Josh Klemons: I love that. One of my next questions was like how are you actually like using like both social in general but sway also to organize and I love that application like hey I’m interviewing this person that could be your state rep or your congressional

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: candidate um tune in and so you can like go to Sway and tell them to tune like you’re not doing the live in Sway you’re doing that on Instagram but you’re sending folks to Instagram All

Erika Harrison: No, it’s it’s on Yeah, I’m sending it to them, but I because I recognize you’re scrolling.

Josh Klemons: right.

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: You don’t know what district you’re in. So, you’re thinking, “Okay, that’s cool. She’s interviewing that lady. I don’t know who she is.” Um, other thing is because the the Texas 18th race became a really big deal in Harris County. Uh this was to replace this is the historic black district in in Houston. It was we have like we had it was on the ballot like four times the last six months. So a lot of people think they’re in the 18th and they’re not. So I have to also help move them from being hyperfocused about oh Christian Miny won. Okay, Christian Miffy is not your rep. You’ve got an opportunity to vote for other people.

Erika Harrison: I need you to to know that. That’s also been a big part of it as well because people see and Christian men I should say Congressman Christian Minipy sees himself that way. like he’s like, “Oh, you’re my, you know, I I support everybody.” No, they got to go vote for the person on their ballot. So, that’s also been part of why I’ve been doing this as well, so people can know.

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: And and that was other big thing for Sway when we uh because that the new maps went in place and most of the websites were not updated. updated. So Sway got updated before a lot of other websites and when you logged in the very top it will tell you you were in the ninth you’re now in the 18th. Vote

Claire Shorall: Yeah, we uh yeah,

Josh Klemons: That’s that San Francisco energy right there.

Erika Harrison: accordingly.

Claire Shorall: we were like we we have to get this right.

Josh Klemons: I like that.

Claire Shorall: We we’re going to put a banner at the top.

Claire Shorall: Let me say a couple more things about messaging. So, yes, right now it is monoirectional. We are adding uh like some React capabilities and um

Erika Harrison: Oh, that’s

Claire Shorall: Okay, good.

Erika Harrison: cute.

Claire Shorall: Uh, and then, uh, some of this is just we’re going to see how people like there is there is no shortage of places to talk politics on the internet. Um, so I don’t know how much Sway needs to be the hub for conversations, but it would be nice to like think you’re the leadership of groups that you’re in. So, we’ll see what that ends up looking like. Um, secondly, like people should know Sway is free and the messaging is free. If people have the app downloaded, it shows up as a native notive. If they signed up with their uh phone number, it shows up as a text. And if they sign up with email, it goes to their inbox. Um, but you know, Erica is doing cool applications. So are other people. People send mobilized links.

 

Claire Shorall: Um, we’ve had candidates reach out and be like, “Oh my god, you know, somebody sent a link on Sway and we had 10 times the normal show up for volunteers.” because like some of this is, you know, you don’t want to hear from the the fear-mongering text messages or whatever. You want to hear from the people that you’ve opted into and and trust. So that that’s really cool. There’s some leaders who send basically like daily messages being like, you’re in this person, this Congress person’s seat and they are like a key vote on whatever. Call them. And they just put the phone number in there. And I’m like, I love this application. And like I I want to be in a group that is just giving me one action a day. Let’s go.

Josh Klemons: Yeah, that’s interesting because you’ve on the site it’s very much geared around like voting,

Claire Shorall: Um

Josh Klemons: but that’s true. It can also be about like pressure after the fact. Like if you want to like organize people to be calling your state rep uh or your congressperson

 

Claire Shorall: yeah.

Josh Klemons: or whatever, you could be like pinging them directly in there. That’s an interesting application. I hadn’t considered

Claire Shorall: Yeah. I we actually think of ourselves as citizen lobbying.

Josh Klemons: that.

Claire Shorall: So we are more like while the election is important right now and it’s the the mechanism by which change I think gets most clearly communicated um no this is ultimately a play at power and getting people to voting together is is the

Josh Klemons: Interesting.

Claire Shorall: the final step of turning in the group project but there’s a lot of things that go into um and and for what it’s worth this is my probably hottest take but I feel like most people are not looking to be more civically engaged. So, in many ways, this is a way of putting a superhero cape on the people like Erica or on you and knowing that my values are getting exercised in the world and not trying to make every single person have to be you or an Erica. Now granted, like I want more people to be.

 

Claire Shorall: So, I I taught high school for a decade. I used to tell my bio students on day one like, “Why do I need you to get really good at science and like analyzing evidence and whatever?” And they’d be like, “Cuz you want me to be a doctor.” And I’d be like, “Cool if you want that.” But no, I actually need you to be a good juror and voter. Like, these are the things, right? And so, you know, this is not me saying everybody just, you know, become a sheep and follow follow folks. That’s like the last thing we would want. But I also knocked on so many doors in Pennsylvania where families were like getting all kids into the car for a soccer game and what like not everybody needs to be needs to be added in

Josh Klemons: So I again I got loads of friends that text me morning of election.

Claire Shorall: as

Josh Klemons: Who am I who am I supposed to vote for? Like I get that all the time.

 

Josh Klemons: So, and I no judgment. Like not even an ounce of judgment for me.

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: Me

Josh Klemons: Life is freaking hard. Everybody’s freaking busy.

Erika Harrison: either.

Josh Klemons: And I I feel honored that somebody trusts me to like reach out.

Claire Shorall: Just the polls.

Josh Klemons: But like yeah,

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: I mean I’m sure there’s not a lot of people in people’s lives that like can do that for them.

Erika Harrison: No.

Josh Klemons: So like you know like

Erika Harrison: That’s why the thing about Sway that I love too and and I’m not sure where in Wisconsin you are if this is the

Josh Klemons: I

Erika Harrison: case, but Madison. Okay. So, you probably have a couple, you know, state house districts and what have you. What I like about Suave, I people are like, “Well, why don’t you can you just print print the list on your Instagram again?” I’m like, “No, because I know what you all are going to do. You think that you’re in the 18th and you’re not.

 

Erika Harrison: You’re going to write down the 18th candidates and you’re going to go on there and not know what like not know Sway is going to filter

Josh Klemons: right

Erika Harrison: for your ballot. So, it’s going to take my whole list. You have to put your address in to get on there and it’s going to filter for your specific ballot. So, all you’re going to see from my list is what’s on your ballot.” So, we don’t have no confusion, especially with a hundred things on the list. And the Houston metro area is is hu I mean I’ve got f I wanted to focus on Harris County and I got bullied to adding

Josh Klemons: Good.

Erika Harrison: some of our neighboring counties our suburban and I do mean bullied. So the um so I had to start adding those in in as well. But that means they have to filter for what’s on their specific ballot.

Josh Klemons: Right.

Erika Harrison: And that is that’s like the really big benefit there for Sway is that filter piece because people

 

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: people don’t know what’s on their ballot.

Josh Klemons: No, that’s really cool. How are you moving folks from social media? And I mean I it seems like you hadn’t blogged in a bit. Like it seems like most of your energy these days on social fair enough. Me too. How are you moving people from social media to Sway uh in order to be able to have these

Erika Harrison: One,

Josh Klemons: conversations?

Erika Harrison: the big thing was when it was time for recommendations, I had done recommendations before. People were looking for them. So, I’m like, they’re on here.

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Erika Harrison: The other thing I keep saying, if you want updates that are specific to your districts, this is where where you should go.

Josh Klemons: Got

Erika Harrison: This is where I’m going to be sending those updates. And so, um, if you’re interested in flipping the state house, I’m using Sway.

Josh Klemons: it.

Erika Harrison: I went through, there’s 150 state house reps in Texas. I went through and added all 150 to my SW.

 

Erika Harrison: Now, is it annoying to scroll past all the like to scroll? Yes. But they’re all on there because I want everybody from Texas to know that you can come on here and see who your Democratic candidate is and get familiar with their name. Um, and then just kind of building capacity about what’s happening in the upcoming election. So, I would say things like, um, I ask people open people love a open-ended question. Who’s your stay half for it? And if you don’t know, here’s the link. And then who is the next action item? Okay. Okay. Your rep is this person. Okay. They’re being challenged by this candidate. Join my SW. I’m sending updates about them as well. So, uh I also have it tagged. Uh it’s it’s it’s pinned. It’s in my on my bio link. So,

Josh Klemons: Got

Erika Harrison: when I get like a kind of influx of new followers from a video, people people start clicking.

Josh Klemons: it.

Erika Harrison: People click on I wouldn’t click on that. So, people click on the most random things without any instruction and they just join. I had someone join me from Hawaii recently, Claire.

Josh Klemons: That’s

Erika Harrison: Now it’s it’s messed up my

Josh Klemons: awesome.

Claire Shorall: Saw your map. Yep. Yep.

Erika Harrison: mood.

Claire Shorall: Yep. I know. I know. We’re gonna fix it.

Josh Klemons: Yes.

Erika Harrison: The a little like zoomed out now

Josh Klemons: I I’m curious.

Erika Harrison: because

Josh Klemons: So, you said you added all 150 state me state house members to yours, but how do you handle that in a primary?

Erika Harrison: so I didn’t do it for the primary. This was just for the primary. I really focused on Harris County because I wanted to focus on people I knew people I could give I could call.

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Erika Harrison: And uh like for judges, I sat down with people, friends of mine who really are in in court like you know and I said you know give me the rundown.

 

Erika Harrison: So every recommendation I have is not really somebody if I didn’t know personally and didn’t have enough information. I I made a call. Fort Ben County for example is one of our neighboring counties. I don’t it’s a suburban county. It’s it’s a it’s one of our it’s in the Houston metro area. I I called people in for because people kept saying what are we doing in Fort Ben? I don’t know.

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Erika Harrison: But I called someone in Fort Ben and got the information because I didn’t want to just be up here saying I don’t know I have no history. I mean even though I grew I grew up down the street couldn’t tell you. So I I got information from from them.

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: So that’s part of what I what I do when it comes to that. But I didn’t for the primary I kind of kept it a lot tighter the general because I want people to be familiar with the candidates. I want them to be invested with the down ballot because I think if you are invested if you know for example a young man name is named Tyler Smith he’s running to flip a seat in the uh Houston suburbs.

 

Erika Harrison: He’s running to flip a seat held by a woman named Lacy Hull and I want you if

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Erika Harrison: you like okay I’m coming here to vote for the Senate governor. I may get I may go vote D for some of these other statewide races then I’m out. But if you have heard Tyler’s name and you’re like but Erica told me Tyler’s on my ballot. let me keep going till I find him because now you have a familiarity with that name and that makes a difference uh when you start seeing names that you know and you be like ew because these are people they don’t they’re not going to have a commercial they may not be even able to send you a mailer if you’re lucky you may get a door knocker but that but that’s kind of the gist of it you know and so we know that name recognition does make a big difference with people feeling invested in those down ballot races

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: Yeah. No, I I love all that. Um, so I work a ton of races.

 

Josh Klemons: I work statewide stuff in congressional, but a ton of down ballot races.

Erika Harrison: Mhm.

Josh Klemons: And I actually, like I mentioned, I do a lot of like organizing and mobilizing on social. I pretty much maybe never um endorse in primaries.

Erika Harrison: Mhm.

Josh Klemons: I won’t even tell people to vote for the candidate I’m working for often because I want folks to vote in November. candidate got through and if I told them to vote for one and that person doesn’t win I don’t want to be the reason they were like well Josh only you know so I for me it’s like as long as everybody’s engaged whoever gets through gets through and you know I work really hard to get candidates elected and then folks are like who should I vote for in this race I’m like there’s a couple great people you know like I’m actually very uncomfortable like advocating for the candidates I’m working for and there’s also like a disclosure thing like should I be saying I work for them so I just I’m actually very careful to not do that but it’s also a challenge For me, it sounds like you have a very different situation because you’re I mean, you’re not working in politics the way I am.

 

Josh Klemons: You’re doing politics, you know, and so it’s like easier for you to just like say, “Okay, yeah, I like this person.” But yeah, I was very It’s hard to imagine being able to pick winners in 150 primaries. So, I was curious if that was something you were trying to do because that’s a freaking full-time job right there.

Erika Harrison: is even the judges.

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: I mean I mean I tell you crowd sourcing I had to sit down with several friends that are lawyers and walk through these different ones uh because it like that’s like it’s like 60 or 70 judges that that are on our ballot and

Josh Klemons: I mean, we have judges here and they’re nonpartisan and it’s so hard, but like a dozen is a lot.

Erika Harrison: and

Josh Klemons: Like,

Claire Shorall: Yeah,

Josh Klemons: normally it’s a couple. So, yeah, doing five dozen like I don’t even know how you start something like I mean, yeah,

Claire Shorall: we’re we’re looking to fix this productwise.

Josh Klemons: that’s wild.

Claire Shorall: Well, one, uh, not making a recommendation on Sway is no issue whatsoever.

 

Claire Shorall: So, like if Josh, when you have your voting group, uh even if you didn’t make any recommendations, you’ll still see the turnout for your group, which I think is really powerful. Okay, putting that to the side, uh Erica went and did the yman’s work for Fort Bend, but by November and actually this functionality exists, but uh what will happen is that person in Fort Bend should go ahead and make their own Sway group and then Erica can join a coalition with that person on

Josh Klemons: Cool.

Claire Shorall: Sway such that all of those ballot recommendations get passed through. You can imagine that the power of coalitions across the country would mean that let’s say you know you’ve been watching Erica’s content. I I lived in Houston for five years so like I love it because a lot of the things that I see on Erica’s page I’m like oh I know that. Um but I could trust Erica and then receive recommendations in California based on my trust in Erica and her trust in other groups. So anyway, this is like a it’s it’s the internet as the internet was designed.

 

Josh Klemons: Right.

Claire Shorall: it’s a network. Um, but you know, previously we didn’t have that functionality in place. So, it was really incredible to watch Erica get bullied and like I realized that you actually did because I was like, “Oh my gosh, I’m so sorry, Erica. There’s so many extra people you have to

Josh Klemons: Thanks.

Erika Harrison: But my number Fort Ben doesn’t have as many people as to Harris County.

Claire Shorall: add.

Erika Harrison: So that made it easier. But then also too, the number of people I had from Fort Ben that were joining my group also justified it. I started looking and saying,”Okay,

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: I’ve got a there’s enough of you all here that it does make sense for me to put before been recommendations. You all came even though I was saying Harris County only. And then uh on the flip of that too, Brazoria County has a big suburb called Periland. And Periland has been a very popular suburb for black uh upperly mobile black folks for for some time. And they weren’t in my group.

Erika Harrison: They weren’t joining. And I said, “Okay.” So I I started adding Bersoria to get them more engaged. Uh and and we actually had a flip in Bora County. Um the Parland mayor is the first the first black mayor in Parland was elected maybe uh just a few months ago. So So there’s there’s some activity there second.

Claire Shorall: on May 2nd. Erica, wait, can I actually can I put this like just like if you’re looking at Texas,

Erika Harrison: Yeah.

Claire Shorall: it’s wild because they had an election, a special election in February. It was I think February 18th that you had that one and then another one on March 3rd and then they had a special for city council. Oh no, Josh, come back.

Erika Harrison: I don’t records when he’s gone.

Claire Shorall: I know. Well,

Erika Harrison: We had all those specials and I had someone stop me.

Claire Shorall: oh my god, there’s like eight

Erika Harrison: I had someone stop me at the Tal Rico town hall and she told me,

Claire Shorall: elections.

 

Erika Harrison: “Thank you for that message on Sway. We wouldn’t have known to go vote in that KDISD thing.” So, we were the people up there voting for school district without even having kids.

Claire Shorall: Wait,

Erika Harrison: So,

Claire Shorall: that’s the most quotable thing ever right

Erika Harrison: Oh,

Josh Klemons: Will you say it again because I didn’t hear it?

Erika Harrison: yeah.

Claire Shorall: there.

Erika Harrison: So the um we have a lot of special elections, a lot of smaller elections. So like especially for our our school boards.

Josh Klemons: Sorry.

Erika Harrison: So I was at the Ter Rico town hall which I something else I sent out to my followers like hey my Sway people because I can post it online but Sway these are these are voters you know. So like I know their interest level is a little bit higher. So it’s kind of like a little you know it’s like a segmented part of of Black Girl Brunch followers. But I had a um two people stopped me that were together. They were something like that.

 

Erika Harrison: They go oh thank you. We live in Katy, Houston, Houston suburb, and we went and voted in that Katy ISD school board race that you told us about. We didn’t know about we didn’t know what’s happening. You know, we don’t have kids. We we don’t have kids in school, but we went out there and voted. And those kind of things are huge. And that’s how how we’ve had um these crazy takeovers of our school boards in Texas because they’re these random Saturdays, these elections are happening and it’s there’s not a lot of conversation about it and people don’t know.

Josh Klemons: Yeah. Uh yeah, absolutely. Um Claire, can you talk a little bit are campaigns do you have any campaigns actually using Sway directly?

Claire Shorall: Uh I mean the short answer is yes but it has an asterisk on it. So we see sway as a three-sided marketplace. There’s leaders like you you both. There are uh the voters which is like the 99% who are coming here for information and to give their leverage and then candidates.

 

Claire Shorall: Candidates have been basically like jerryrigging a system for themselves. We need to build out more candidate tools and suite. Um but what they do frequently is come on to Sway and then find people who because you can like go into certain geographies and like look at who is making recommendations. Erica, you’ve been reached out to by candidates,

Erika Harrison: We It was very early on we were like we’re just like moving and grooving because like remember they kind of

Claire Shorall: right?

Erika Harrison: roll this out with Texas so we don’t we don’t know. And I started messaging Claire. I said oh the candidates have found this. They’re going on here to see who who’s been recommended. Then I started seeing people like especially judges putting me oh I was listed on their like endorsement list because they went on there and found it. People were like why didn’t you pick me? I was like okay. So it was very people people trying to figure it out but they went on there and they yeah the candidates definitely found

 

Josh Klemons: I mean,

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: it.

Josh Klemons: is that is it nice that they added you as endorser?

Claire Shorall: No.

Josh Klemons: Like is that flattering or you like pissed that like they took something from one place and put it someplace else or how’d you approach

Erika Harrison: No I wasn’t I wasn’t mad.

Josh Klemons: that?

Erika Harrison: I wasn’t mad at all. It just was like there are times, this is just a me thing.

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Erika Harrison: I this started very much as a fly on the wall situation, me talking about politics. It was me and my people, me and my followers. And over time, it has just become it’s a lot bigger than that. The candidates are following, they’re watching, they’re the electeds are following, they’re watching, they’re having conversations. So, it just sometimes I’m like, “Okay, this is getting a little more serious now. I’m on a list of endorsers.” So, it’s that that’s just a me thing. But it it but it is what it is.

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Claire Shorall: This is This is the goal.

 

Josh Klemons: Um,

Claire Shorall: This is the goal to have more more of Erica’s everywhere,

Josh Klemons: right. So, yeah,

Claire Shorall: including Josh’s

Josh Klemons: I’m I’m curious, Claire. Obviously, that’s the goal for you, Erica. Make the pitch. Why would a content creator who’s already doing so much work to like organize folks online, create content, moderate their content, engage in the comments, it’s a whole other job, right? Like obviously it sounds to you like this is worthwhile for you. Why should another political content creator think about doing this

Erika Harrison: on Sway. So,

Josh Klemons: also?

Erika Harrison: I I would say the also piece of it is is a little Sway is not a huge lift, right? It’s it’s not you you can go on there and you can build your page. You can make it as simple as you want to, make it as complicated as you want to grab a banner photo up there, use some something that you already have on other social media platforms. You can also reuse content from like I’ll they have now where you if you do like a a cute video with a candidate like for example I did a video with Genie Nosa.

 

Erika Harrison: Oh, I should go add that to Sway with our u we the Netflix trend with her. So you can you can reuse content there.

Josh Klemons: Mhm.

Erika Harrison: But what I would say is that if you for several things like one it’s it’s the the big thing that I tell I tell content creators that backend data is is is just undeniable. I can walk in to tell a member of Congress, I’ve got this group of of um 2400 people and 200 of them are 200 of them are no like in the 18th I think I may have it’s a lot maybe it’s like 400.

Claire Shorall: like Yeah. 400 or

Erika Harrison: Well, I can tell Congressman Christian Miny that I’ve got 400 people that live in your district that are in my group that I have

Claire Shorall: something.

Josh Klemons: Sure.

Erika Harrison: the power to message and me messaging them comes off a lot different than when they message them, you know, because it’s not like oh they want something, right? So that back-end data that can really help you um help you also curate your content and be specific in that way too.

 

Erika Harrison: It also helps you to be a it has this this the the text messaging tool I think is super powerful and also these are people who’ve opted into this who’ve opted into who we know are voters like that you don’t just hop on swag just because you’re bored that’s no you are interested you are you are more of a voter right and so being able to

Josh Klemons: Right.

Erika Harrison: zone in and kind of and have your little voter voting focus group is is super valuable so yes I think

Josh Klemons: Sure.

Erika Harrison: um just also just from a logistics logistics standpoint it is so much easier to go find somebody’s sway group and send that sway link. When people’s like, “Oh, do you have a list of recommendations for the upcoming race? Here’s the sway link.” That is easier to send. Then I’ve got I’m originally from Missouri,

Josh Klemons: Right.

Erika Harrison: but I grew up in Houston. I’ll go like send links from that, you know, from different states. I I can keep a little list, you know, notepad with people from Dallas and I’ll send their sway links when people asking for Dallas recommendations.

Erika Harrison: So, just from efficiency standpoint, I can see people, oh, it’s a whole other social media platform. It’s not. It’s a it’s a from an efficiency standpoint, it’s a tool that’s going to help you really focus in on people who are tapped in and and want to vote. I It’s interesting. I don’t see it like social media, but I did have a girl stop me in anthropology this weekend and was like, “Oh my god, I follow you.” And usually people say they follow me. It’s Tik Tok. They’ll say Tik Tok. My OG will say Instagram,

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Erika Harrison: but it is Tik Tok. And she said, “I follow you on Swag.” Which is the first somebody to stop me and say they follow me on Swag. I was like,

Josh Klemons: Whoa.

Erika Harrison: “Oh.” I had a front of the phone. She then she followed me on Sway, which to me that group is more powerful to me because it shows more of your actual political influence. We can be on here yelling into a void uh politically,

 

Josh Klemons: Right.

Erika Harrison: but but it’s so different when it’s online. Like I we’ve had several people that have had millions of followers run for Congress and what happened? They lost.

Josh Klemons: Oh yeah, for sure. Yeah.

Erika Harrison: Like the guy in Houston that came in very I mean like he got like 4% of the vote had significantly more followers than everybody else on that ballot because your followers people following doesn’t really tell you a whole lot.

Josh Klemons: Yep.

Erika Harrison: You don’t know where they live at. You can get some backend data but nothing like what you can get on swag with you can tell see what what you down to what state house district they are in.

Josh Klemons: F

Erika Harrison: That’s very beneficial data if you are trying to be be thoughtful in content and understanding hierarchy and local and state and all those different things.

Josh Klemons: Had Claire heard before that somebody recognized you from Sway

Erika Harrison: I think I posted on I don’t know if you saw I posted on threads. I don’t know if you saw

 

Josh Klemons: because I’m sure that was a highlight of her day right

Claire Shorall: like this is like yeah this is an incredible moment.

Josh Klemons: there.

Claire Shorall: So uh

Erika Harrison: that.

Josh Klemons: Uh Claire,

Claire Shorall: thanks.

Josh Klemons: talk um talk a little like just briefly about where you see this going. You’ve talked about additional tools, but like obviously you guys are pre-monetization. Like are you all trying to grow this into like something bigger?

Claire Shorall: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: Are you trying to partner with others down the road? Like you don’t need to get into the business model of it, but I am curious about like where you see this going in the next couple

Claire Shorall: Yeah. So,

Josh Klemons: cycles.

Claire Shorall: in November 2026, we would like one million voters to utilize Sway uh to informs.

Josh Klemons: How close are you?

Claire Shorall: Uh we’re at like 50.

Josh Klemons: You got a while. Okay.

Claire Shorall: We got we got I mean you know But the potential energy is is like sparking,

Josh Klemons: simmering.

Claire Shorall: you know, like I feel it.

 

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Claire Shorall: And I would also say um our growth rate is really strong right now

Josh Klemons: Okay.

Claire Shorall: and there’s like now coming into August, I’m very excited for all these primaries that are about to come up. Um but just like the the media doesn’t clue in, I think September and October are going to be fun. So uh that’s one thing. But in 2028,

Josh Klemons: if if we survive it. Me and Derek anyway, I don’t know. Like I’m I’m struggling to make it through August 11th, which is our primary here, and November feels like a long way away. So, okay. Go ahead.

Claire Shorall: 98 days, but who’s counting?

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Claire Shorall: Um, anyway, uh, in 2028, it is my hope that across the country, there’s a series of town hall debates where sway leaders use their sway counts as their entry into those fora. And that is where candidates come and talk with people who have influ verified influence with their constituents. So all across the country and including a national televised I mean probably internet native because that’s who we are but internet native uh presidential debate where it’s like why are you here?

 

Claire Shorall: It’s because you have sway and how do we know? Because these voters follow you. Um so yeah I I mean I think by 2028 if this becomes the dominant tool for people to aggregate and showcase collective will we will have done something and then off to the international races.

Josh Klemons: Oh, interesting. Uh, Erica, what is the wildest, most exciting uh, weirdest race you’re falling right now and excited about? You got anybody you want to pitch right

Erika Harrison: Wow.

Josh Klemons: now?

Erika Harrison: And I feel like there’s like one that I’m just not thinking of. Um, you know, I I would say this. our our Senate race is getting a lot more of the attention and I get it. But for when we talk about when we complain about what’s going on in Texas, I’m like governor’s race, governor’s race,

Josh Klemons: Yeah,

Erika Harrison: governor’s race.

Josh Klemons: y’all going to flip it this year.

Erika Harrison: I think that Yeah.

Josh Klemons: You got a real

Erika Harrison: You know, I I think that one’s really interesting um strategically at the top.

 

Josh Klemons: path.

Erika Harrison: I just did a video about this, but like I I’m just really interested in how Greg Abbott is moving because he’s having to spread himself a little bit to make cover for Kim Paxton being a hot a hot mess of a campaigner,

Josh Klemons: Yeah, for sure.

Erika Harrison: a fundraiser, a candidate. And so just what does that mean for Greg Abbott if he has to now he’s got a he’s got a bunch of money.

Josh Klemons: A

Erika Harrison: He has enough to cover for him and kid. However, but what does it mean for Greg Abbott if he has to cover for a bad candidate at the top?

Josh Klemons: bunch.

Erika Harrison: How does that play for even our our other down ballot statewide candidate? So that’s what I’m I’m really I I not gonna lie to you. Am I am I always hopeful we can win the top of ticket? Yes. Because it’s we’re 30 years losers in Texas. However, I would be if we are able to like clip off one of those statewide races like uh controller or um AG railroad commissioner.

 

Erika Harrison: I will have a party like I just like we like you know a couple of one and people like what? Y’all have no idea what this means. And so, um, those are the kind of weird races that I’m really following and following the energy behind that and trying to help boost where I can because again, I find if people know these names down the ballot, they’re more invested in voting down

Josh Klemons: Hell yeah. No, I love it. Uh, so on that,

Erika Harrison: ballot.

Josh Klemons: how can folks keep in touch with you? Like Erica, do you want them to follow you if you’re if they’re outside Texas? Are you looking for a national audience? Are you keeping it

Erika Harrison: I know I I talk about national things. I mean, you know,

Josh Klemons: local?

Erika Harrison: right now I’ve had to go hyper hyper focused on Texas because we most of our stuff is um during the midterm. So, we do governor. All our statewide races are during the midterm.

 

Erika Harrison: But, you know, hello. The president, we got we we know our dates now for South Carolina. The primary is January 2028. So, I’ll be shifting back to that.

Josh Klemons: Yeah,

Erika Harrison: I tell people,

Josh Klemons: it’s a big one for y’all. Big air for y’all or big

Erika Harrison: yeah, yeah, yeah. People are like, Erica, they’re like, oh, you know, who do you have for the presidential election?

Josh Klemons: cycle.

Erika Harrison: Midterms first. So, I’ll be shifting back to that. I also I’m nosy. I love I follow other other folks. I I was all up in the main stuff with platiner that was very interesting to me from a national level and different for consultants and all that. So yeah, I talk about other things but um in my sway I do I will send recommendations updates about different things that are happening there. I probably will end up doing a a live here soon about Missouri races. Um likely on Instagram with a friend of mine because I got a large I have a pretty decent following in Missouri because I I’m from there

 

Josh Klemons: Oh,

Erika Harrison: and went to college and there so I dabble in things all over the country just you know where where is

Josh Klemons: cool.

Erika Harrison: interesting to me. But I have a knowledge base. I’m never going to claim to be like super knowledgeable outside of my own not even I don’t even come out for Dallas. I’m very much Houston uh focused.

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Erika Harrison: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: I mean, Texas is a whole world and Harris County is a giant piece of that whole world. So, yeah, no doubt. Uh, no, that’s really cool. Um, and I’ll have links to like your socials and your blog and uh your Sway and Claire, what’s the best way for like obviously head to the site, but like are y’all doing stuff on social? Is there any place else they should be following you and or

Claire Shorall: Uh no, my biggest ask is just go and download the app actually.

Josh Klemons: Sway?

Claire Shorall: So go to either the uh app store or the Android store because if there is that one candidate, we didn’t even talk about this functionality, but if there is that one candidate that you’re super excited about or that one group that you really want to join, we can actually look locally at all your contacts in your phone and you can become like a oneperson digital door knocker to get people out uh and know that the people who you are texting uh or trying to get to the polls actually can vote uh in that particular race.

Claire Shorall: So,

Josh Klemons: Yeah.

Claire Shorall: I will hit up my Wisconsin friends. Uh hopefully I will be able to give them a guide. But,

Josh Klemons: Yeah. No, absolutely.

Claire Shorall: um

Josh Klemons: It’s more of a relational tool than I realized from the site.

Erika Harrison: Claire’s Yeah,

Josh Klemons: Like that’s cool. So, uh something to promote for sure.

Erika Harrison: Claire didn’t say this,

Claire Shorall: yeah,

Erika Harrison: but she also is a LinkedIn influencer. Nobody posts stuff on LinkedIn like Claire, so follow her over there.

August 10, 2026/0 Comments/by Josh Klemons
https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Turning-followers-into-voters-with-Erika-Harrison-of-Black-Girls-Who-Brunch-and-Claire-Shorall-of-Sway.jpg 1080 1080 Josh Klemons https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Reverbal-Communications-Josh-Klemons.svg Josh Klemons2026-08-10 11:20:322026-08-10 11:20:32Turning Followers Into Voters with Erika Harrison of Black Girls Who Brunch and Claire Shorall of Sway | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 55
Hello Merge Tag, Politics

Stop Thinking About Persuasion. Start With The Bedrock Approach.

Read more
June 1, 2026/by Josh Klemons
https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Stop-Thinking-About-Persuasion.-Start-With-The-Bedrock-Approach.png 1350 1080 Josh Klemons https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Reverbal-Communications-Josh-Klemons.svg Josh Klemons2026-06-01 09:53:322026-06-18 12:22:40Stop Thinking About Persuasion. Start With The Bedrock Approach.
Hello Merge Tag, Politics

Are Democrats Ready for Our First Truly AI Election? with Jack Welty | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 53

Are Democrats Ready for Our First Truly AI Election? jack welty

 

“Every day that we are not adopting this stuff, the other side is moving faster. And I think ultimately that’s going to translate into votes.” — Jack Welty

This is the first election cycle where what ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok say about candidates could actually shape how voters decide. And as Jack Welty sees it, our side isn’t ready.

Jack served as Deputy Chief Analytics Officer on the Harris for President campaign and led paid digital analytics for Biden-Harris in 2020. He co-authored a paper on practical AI adoption for campaigns and is the co-creator of Caucus AI, a tool that monitors what AI chatbots are telling voters about candidates across more than 1,100 races.

He joined me on Hello Merge Tag to talk about something I don’t think our side is taking seriously enough.

The conversation covered a lot of ground. But the through line was this: Democrats are falling behind Republicans on AI adoption, and the gap isn’t closing. The American Association of Political Consultants found that 44% of Republican consultants use AI daily. Only 28% of Democrats do.

A few things that stuck with me:

The biggest wins from AI aren’t the sexy stuff. Jack’s argument is that the most underrated use of AI on campaigns is automating the boring, high-volume work that eats up staff hours. On the Harris campaign, his team fed thousands of post-shift volunteer feedback surveys into a language model and got back structured reports by date, state, and issue type. What would have required an engineer and custom code 18 months ago, he says you could now do by dragging a folder into Claude.

AI is a management challenge, not a technical one. This reframe is the most useful thing I took away from the conversation. You don’t need to know how to code. You need to know how to delegate, review, and give feedback. The analogy Jack uses — treating AI like an eager but inexperienced junior staffer — is exactly right. You wouldn’t hand an intern a blank page and say “write me a report, see you at 5.” You’d give them examples, context, and check in along the way. Same deal here.

Which chatbot a voter uses quietly determines which media ecosystem they’re in. Caucus AI tracks what ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok tell voters about candidates. The responses are broadly factual — nobody’s telling voters who to pull the lever for. But the sources each model cites are very different. Grok cites social media. ChatGPT leans heavily on its national media partnerships — Axios, AP, Washington Post. Gemini casts a wider net and is more likely to cite local news. Same question, three different information worlds.

Your .gov site matters more than you think. This is something I had definitely been sleeping on. Caucus AI found that official government sites get cited by these models at a much higher rate than campaign sites. If you’re an incumbent and your official site is a graveyard of four-year-old press releases, you’re leaving something real on the table. Same goes for Ballotpedia — candidates can fill out their own candidate surveys, and Ballotpedia is one of the top two or three cited sources across most of these models. Most campaigns aren’t doing this. They should be.

ChatGPT indexed a brand new Wikipedia page in 12 minutes. Caucus AI created a Wikipedia entry for a lesser-known candidate and within 12 minutes, ChatGPT was citing the brand new page. Two-thirds of all sources in its subsequent answers about those candidates came from that single page. There’s no fact-checking layer. No delay. It’s pretty clear your campaign needs a Wikipedia strategy!

Top takeaways:

  • Democrats are behind Republicans on AI adoption and the gap isn’t closing. This is a competitive disadvantage that will eventually show up in votes.
  • The biggest wins come from automating routine, high-volume work — not from generating content or running AI-powered ads.
  • Treat AI like a junior staffer. Give it context, examples, and check its work. The management skills matter more than the technical ones.
  • Update your Ballotpedia candidate survey. Make sure your robots.txt isn’t blocking AI crawlers. If you’re an incumbent, don’t neglect your .gov site.
  • Caucus AI is tracking 1,100 races across three models and publishing their findings at caucus-ai.com. Worth bookmarking.

Listen to the full episode right here, or wherever you stream podcasts.

If you prefer video, you can also watch our full conversation:

Find all episodes at HelloMergeTag.com or wherever you stream podcasts.

Links

The white paper Jack wrote with Meg Schwenzfeier

Caucus AI

Jack’s email | LinkedIn | Twitter

The blog post I wrote about asking ChatGPT to compare the email programs of Joe Biden and Donald Trump

 

Big thanks to our sponsors:

Civic Shout. Learn more about the great work they’re doing to help Democratic campaigns and progressive nonprofits build their lists ethically at civicshout.com/partners.

 

Episode Transcript

This transcript was automatically generated and has not been copy-edited. While it can serve as a helpful guide to our conversation, it may contain errors or omissions. For the most accurate representation, we recommend listening to (or watching) the full episode.

Josh Klemons: Jack Welty advises progressive organizations on technology strategy, data infrastructure, and product development. He served as deputy chief analytics officer on the Harris for president campaign and led paid digital analytics for the 2020 Biden Harris campaign. He co-authored a paper on practical AI adoption for campaigns and is the co-creator of Caucus AI, a research tool that monitors what AI chatbots tell voters about candidates and elections. First of all, thank you so much for coming on the pod. I really want to talk about the paper you authored, Generative AI on campaigns. In it, you argue that Democrats need to get serious about AI, but not for things like content generation, deep fakes, but for the boring stuff. Before we get into what that means practically, just give us the elevator pitch for why you think any of this matters right now.

Josh Klemons: Maybe it’s obvious to some, but like it’s probably not to others. So, lay it out for
Jack Welty: Yeah, totally. Uh, and thank you so much for for having me on. Um,
Josh Klemons: us.
Jack Welty: yeah, I mean, of all of the organizations in politics, campaigns are, as we all know, the most resource constrained. So, um, I think generative AI, especially the the big leaps we’ve seen in the tools in the last like year or so, offer an opportunity for our campaigns to get more efficient, uh, get more done and leave more time for our, uh, you know, talented staffers to focus on the hard stuff, the actual strategy problems, talking to voters, etc. Um, and why I think it’s important right now is, um, the American Association of Political Consultants has run a couple of studies uh, of their members. most certainly recently uh in March um that show that there’s a gap between uh Republican and Democratic consultants in uptake. So we are falling behind Republicans in daily AI use in building custom AI tools for our campaigns and in generally like adopting this stuff to make our organizations better.

Jack Welty: So um you know I don’t want to handwave away a lot of the concerns a lot of uh uh you know moral ethical political etc that we might have with the labs and with this technology but every day that we are not adopting this stuff the other side is moving faster and I think ultimately like that’s going to translate into into votes um so I think it it kind of behooves us to to pick up the
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Jack Welty: pace
Josh Klemons: So the numbers you like the AAPC 44% of Republican consultants are using AI daily versus only 28% of uh of Democrats. So, I guess my first like what do you think Republicans are using AI for that Democrats aren’t? Um like do you have a sense of
Jack Welty: Yeah, that’s a great question.
Josh Klemons: that?
Jack Welty: Um, there’s a little bit more in that AAPC study. Um, I don’t think they’re using it for anything crazy. I mean, we are seeing some of the like content generation wars and we don’t have to get too deep into like

Josh Klemons: Okay.
Jack Welty: the NRSC memes. I think a lot of that stuff is probably going to backfire. Um, what Meg and I focused on more in the paper is like just just wrote task automation. You know what I mean? Like I think that Republicans that are using this have more time in their day to think about strategy and higher level problems because they’re spending less time summarizing memos or data entry or what have you. Um, and so that’s where we’re falling behind less on the sort of I don’t think anybody should should put their campaign strategy, you know, totally up to Claude or anything.
Josh Klemons: That seems like a good losing strategy for sure,
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: right? A tool that doesn’t really understand what the hell’s actually happening in the world,
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: doesn’t understand real time results. Um, the other day I asked it a question and it had to like look up who Zon Mom Donnie was and figure out who was the mayor of New York. And it’s like, yeah, if if you don’t understand the context, you’re probably not going to give me like updated answers.

Josh Klemons: But like the argument you’re making is that AI like I think a lot of people the movies and you know like the internet makes it seem like AI is about the sexy stuff like you know the NRSC is running ads now she’s dropped out but like Janet Mills using AI but you’re actually arguing that we should be using more of like the boring tools the automating high volume low complexity work that’s taking up staff hours which is what you just alluded to Republicans are using it so they could spend more time thinking about strategy. So, what did that look like on the Harris campaign? Or maybe it was too soon to say because AI’s come so far since then, but like in your mind,
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: give us some concrete examples of like what would you if you’re getting hired as a consultant tomorrow or you’re just talking to a friend who’s just drowning in work,
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: what’s the first thing you’re doing to help take some of that off their plate and letting AI take the boring stuff off their plate so they can do the actual like important

Jack Welty: Totally. Yeah.
Josh Klemons: stuff
Jack Welty: I have I have a great example from the Harris campaign and again this was you know far in ancient times
Josh Klemons: early in AI. Yeah, I
Jack Welty: uh in AI development back in in you know summer fall of of 2024.
Josh Klemons: know.
Jack Welty: Um but we asked um organizers and volunteers to fill out post shift feedback surveys. How was your canvasing shift? What did you hear on the doors? Did you encounter any issues? yada yada yada. Um, and this was like a great very rich source of data like God bless the volunteers that were,
Josh Klemons: Of Of
Jack Welty: you know, writing detailed notes about their camping experience, whatever. Um, but as you can imagine, especially at a national presidential campaign volume,
Josh Klemons: course.
Jack Welty: this was thousands and thousands and thousands of just free text surveys per day. Um so even with the like again in 26 terms relatively primitive tools available to us um we fed all of that into an LLM um and asked it for structured reports back.

Jack Welty: So we wanted structured summaries broken out by date and state and like type of issue. Were there specific uh flags people were running into? Did a did a staging location not have yard signs? Um, and then also sort of squishier sentiment like what were people telling you commonly on what were we hearing back commonly on the doors from voters etc. Um, and so it turned what would have you know previously been like an absolutely impossible human task of of reading through all of these responses into a like 10 minute click button run pipeline get back structured report. Um, and I think what’s really exciting about that was, you know, one that we were able to get all this actionable information that previously would have taken a bunch of staff hours. Um, but here in 2026, the tools have changed so much that two years ago, this required an engineer and some custom Python code and hitting an API and whatever. And right now,
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: like I think my first move would be to drag that folder of surveys into Claude and ask it for a summary.

Jack Welty: And I think that would give me like a pretty good first pass. Uh compared to what required a ton of custom engineering, you know, 18 months
Josh Klemons: Yeah, that’s super interesting. Were the I’m very curious about the technical mechanism of that.
Jack Welty: ago.
Josh Klemons: Were those typed summaries or were they handwritten? Like could you have handled it if like people were filling these out at events? Like how does that work?
Jack Welty: Yeah, the these were mercifully typed surveys uh just in the back end of a Google form.
Josh Klemons: Okay, so it was pretty easy to just copy and paste.
Jack Welty: Yeah, but but the vision models have come a really long way too.
Josh Klemons: They really
Jack Welty: Uh yeah, we’ve we’ve talked about that. I I think this was in the paper as a potential use case.
Josh Klemons: have.
Jack Welty: Um uh petition uh uh survey verification. So, you know, to get on the ballot, you might go have to collect um you know, thousands of signatures. and previously that’s a that’s a human task to go type that up, look those people up in van, make sure they’re registered to vote in the right, you know, county, precinct, state, whatever.

Jack Welty: Um, I think with some of the these vision models, like we could absolutely develop a pipeline to turn that into text and then automate the lookup and um, you know, that’s tons and tons of poor ballot access fellows time uh saved per
Josh Klemons: So,
Jack Welty: campaign.
Josh Klemons: I do a lot of public speaking on like digital marketing and these days I just have a link on my deck and it’s like if you want to join my mailing list, here’s how. But back in the day, I used to like bring paper, you know, like, you know, similar to a petition kind of thing. Um, and I have these like vivid memories of sitting and trying to like sort through each and every one of those and people’s handwriting is terrible, mine included. Um, and I’m like trying to figure out what the hell that says, and then I’m having to troubleshoot it. And yeah, I like I can’t even imagine the idea that I could just take a photo of each page and be like, could you turn this into a spreadsheet? Uh, and now I’m talking about 10 years ago, but yeah, like today versus even like a year or two ago,

Jack Welty: Yep.
Josh Klemons: I have seen that like it can now like look at an image and like dissect it in a way that it could not a year or two ago. A year or two ago, you kind of had to describe it to it and today I can look at it and be like, “Oh, this is nicely designed or no, this needs work.” It’s like I don’t use chatbt for or I don’t I I stopped chat.
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: I’m on cloud now, but I don’t use it for any design work, but I do sometimes feed it a graphic and say, “Do you like this?” And it gives like surprisingly good feedback like for even for designers out there like it’s worth
Jack Welty: Give me some feedback. Yeah.
Josh Klemons: knowing like if you just like have that nagging you know thing in your head saying this could be better like cloud might be able to tell you if it could be better which I think again that’s where the idea that like only about a quarter of Democratic consultants
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: are using AI at all is like wild to me because I am very selective about when I use it.

Josh Klemons: I’m not using it for any strategy. Like I’m the strategist. That’s like my whole thing. But like it helps me think things through and like talk it out.
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: And the idea that three out of four of us us like Democratic consultants are not using it yet.
Jack Welty: Never mind.
Josh Klemons: I mean, it’s a limitation. Like it’s I get why some aren’t. I I have questions on that. We’ll get to that. So, you describe AI as an eager but inexperienced junior staffer. So, like what does that mean for you? And like how should folks be thinking about their AI tools? Uh they’re not managers. You’re arguing they’re not managers,
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: they’re interns, right? I mean, is that essentially the argument?
Jack Welty: Yeah, that that’s kind of the argument and and I think um what this means is we have to shift into that managerial critic role. Um, for some of us that have managed people, like hopefully this is a natural one, but uh, for junior staff that maybe have not managed work yet, uh, in their careers, I think that it it moves that staff development pipeline left.
Jack Welty: Uh, and so even junior staffers on campaigns need to pick up skills like delegation, review, criticism, you know, breaking work up into bite-sized tasks and stuff like that. Um because yeah, these LLMs have, you know, boundless energy as long as your token budget will account for it. Um but they need direction. Uh they need steering.
Josh Klemons: right?
Jack Welty: They need review. They will confidently plow forward with an incorrect assumption or present to you a wrong answer sort of wrapped in, you know, nice formatting. Um and it means that we have to be like really hyperritical of their outputs. We have to be good reviewers. we cannot just be you know mashing the the tab button or accept at all times. Um and then I think the other big development is you heard a lot in uh late 24 early 25 about prompt engineering. There was this idea that I mean you could tell an LLM like I’ll give you a $100 if you do this task and sometimes it would do the task better.

Jack Welty: Um this latest generation like that doesn’t that stuff doesn’t really work anymore and that was kind of a weird artifact. Um, but context engineering is even more important. And so this is sort of a fancy term that I think applies to the kind of context you would give a junior staffer. Imagine you’re onboarding someone to your organization and you want them to complete a task. You need to give them some background about what the organization is, what you believe, what the goals of the organization are, what the parameters of the task are, what the goals of the task are. Um, I think if you were asking an intern to write a memo, you would maybe give them three past examples of good memos and that would make your intern write a better first draft. Like thinking through all of those things, the more you can carefully curate good context for these models, the better answers, the better results you’re going to get than if you just again sort of like throw it some sort of raw blind question of, you know, write me a first draft of this blog post or what have you.
Josh Klemons: Right. Asking an intern to write a memo when they’ve never seen the type of memo you’re asking for is going to guarantee a bad Right.
Jack Welty: They’re gonna do a bad job.
Josh Klemons: Like, and it’s not their fault. It’s your fault.
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: Like that’s bad management. But like you’re essentially arguing it’s the same with Claude. Like you can’t ask Claude to write a memo. Like a press release and like the context.
Jack Welty: Yes.
Josh Klemons: Like sure, fine. It like understands what a press release is. But if you’re trying to write a specific type of memo without showing it past examples, you should not expect a good output on the first take, right?
Jack Welty: Yeah. And if your organization has a style guide or certain conventions you wanted to follow,
Josh Klemons: And
Jack Welty: that’s something you would give that intern or junior staffer as well. So you should feed that into
Josh Klemons: yeah, I mean, in general, you talk there’s quite a bit about the idea of this being like a management challenge,

Jack Welty: club.
Josh Klemons: not a technical one. And I think that’s interesting language like that I haven’t really heard people talk about. Like so I I am not a coder. I don’t know any I I can’t write code to save my life. I just launched I just vibecoded my first tool. It’s called Shares Sparrow if you go to sharespar.com and it literally lets you take tweets and blue sky posts and turn them into um Instagram friendly graphics. And it’s an idea I’ve had in my head for years. There was a tool that did it. They went away and I was like I’m going to replace it. Um I’m not technical. It was like it’s an interesting idea that it’s a management tool because a lot of it was going back and forth like telling it like no you could be better here. There’s problems here. I really had to like micromanage. like that’s not language I was thinking about when doing it, but I had a hard time figuring out like the Twitter logo.

Josh Klemons: It was like recreating it from scratch. I was like, “No, that’s not the Twitter logo. It doesn’t look like the Twitter logo.” And I had to literally micromanage it to get it there. There was no technical component to it at all. It told me what to do. I did it. I told it what to do. It did it. Um, and we like literally had a conversation while it built a tool that I was excited about. So, I guess what I’m curious about is like of the 28% of us Democrats that are using it, is there a generational breakdown? Like do you have a sense like is the older generation better off for this or worse off for this? And vice versa the younger generation like who is better suited to actually use this? Like somebody I’m in my 40s and I don’t know how to code anything and I don’t need to now. Um somebody in their 20s who like grew up with AI essentially at this point. Like are they better off or worse off because they don’t understand the world without it?

Josh Klemons: Like do you have a sense of that? Like that’s that’s my age-old question I guess when it comes to this kind
Jack Welty: Yeah. Yeah.
Josh Klemons: of
Jack Welty: I think that’s a great question. The unfortunately the the AAPC data does not have an age breakdown and I am sort of on the hunt.
Josh Klemons: Yeah. Seems like they
Jack Welty: Yeah. I’m I’m on the hunt for for more data on this question. So if anyone knows of any,
Josh Klemons: should
Jack Welty: please send it my way. Um, I think it kind of cuts both ways because on one hand, um, you know, us us gri grizzled vets, uh, folks who have been in this space for a while, we know what good work looks like, um, and we know how to be good critics. We know how to give feedback. Um, we have good, you know, definitions of done. Um, and can sort of broad these things into shape, uh, and know not to ship slot basically. Um, so I do think uh uh as long as you know folks from an older generation are willing to lean in and learn the tools, there’s definitely an advantage.

Jack Welty: You know, all of our hard one experiences is not for not um on
Josh Klemons: Like you’re arguing that the experience to not put out garbage matters.
Jack Welty: the
Josh Klemons: Whereas if you don’t really know what good versus bad looks like, it doesn’t matter. Like what I’m hearing is it doesn’t matter how well you understand the AI tools. If you don’t understand what good output looks like, you’re never going to have good output.
Jack Welty: and not just good output but good process as well. Um uh I’ve been exper experimenting a lot more. So I’m a I’m an analyst.
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Jack Welty: I’m an analytics uh professional by trade and um have been exper experimenting a lot more with using these things to produce analysis. So having them you know write SQL, write Python, compute stats and then write analysis.
Josh Klemons: Are you a coder?
Jack Welty: Um I am yeah yeah I’m an engineer.
Josh Klemons: Just so we understand. Like Okay. So you’re like you’re much more advanced than like the average Democratic consultant when it like I I know what Python is.

Jack Welty: Um
Josh Klemons: I have no idea what how to use it. So Okay.
Jack Welty: yeah yeah yeah I’m I’m I I I’m an engineer uh when I wear some hats.
Josh Klemons: Okay. Got
Jack Welty: Um but I think knowing but I think it’s applicable to like any technical or any technical or
Josh Klemons: it.
Jack Welty: non-technical process. Um you have to know the process steps and the gotchas. Um you know even taking a a non-technical uh approach. Maybe you’re a researcher and you want Claude to help you write a research book for a candidate or something. I know I’m gonna get like a lot of researchers who come yell at me that that that’s not possible, but you wanted them to propose a research book. They Claude might go research four of the five, you know, top sources you would go check and then write you a report based on those four or five top sources. Four sources. But if Claude never checked the fifth source, you’re potentially going to be missing some information.

Jack Welty: If Claude never, you know, looked the candidate up in the voter file or something, you’re going to be missing some critical piece of information and Claude is not going to know that it’s missing. Um, I see this in analytics work all the time. Um, Claude still makes silly SQL mistakes or Claude makes assumptions about what data is in what table and doesn’t necessarily surface those assumptions for you. It just produces a nice looking deliverable that has pretty charts. Um, and so the knowledge of all those process steps, the common gotchas, the oh, if you don’t if you forget to filter voter registration status on this field, then your counts are going to be inflated in this way. Like all of that, um, you know, kind of domain knowledge is still really important and frequently for specifically our domains, it’s not in the training set. like a lot of best practices about how democratic campaigns operate are blocked behind the analyst institute payw wall or just in our heads or in our you know organizations Google drive and so that’s the type of context we still need to give these models to get good outputs um I will say on the flip side the folks that have grown up with this I think are going to be like really really dangerous in a great way um I think the AI native you know I think dropping a couple of AI

Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: native 24 year olds on a a modern campaign is going to be produce some like really really impressive outputs uh because they just you know folks have learned to use these tools uh from go.
Josh Klemons: Hey
Jack Welty: They don’t know of a way to operate without them and it means that they can sort of execute at at pretty incredible velocity. So it is not to say that like I’m discounting that entirely like I think those folks are going to really cook when they get into this space. um they’re just going to need to, you know, find a way to sort of distill some of this knowledge
Josh Klemons: Yeah. No, I think that’s really interesting. the part that like I I’m very interested in the idea that output and process can’t be differentiated especially for
Jack Welty: down.
Josh Klemons: what you’re talking about like so like building a graphic like not with AI like if I’m working with a graphic designer and they make a graphic I know if it looks good or not regardless somebody could build a website that I think looks good but is actually terrible and it’s much harder to know because process does matter because it could look gorgeous but the whole thing’s just one big image and not actually

Jack Welty: Yep.
Josh Klemons: live text and like for SEO purposes it’s trash and I see that like clients come to me with a website and I’m like uh this is a Canva image like this is not a website, you know, like I’ve seen that and like I think AI is like the next step and I hadn’t really thought about it that way like the output matters but like to get there you really have to think about the process and right if you don’t have the experience like like you learn the process the hard way pre- AAI so you know what you’re looking for I guess the question now and I don’t know if you have an answer for I don’t even know if it’s a question like how do we ensure that the like AI natives who are like coming onto the campaigns are going to like shake things up in the best possible way I agree like that new energy is always what gives our party life. How do we ensure though that they understand the processes so that they can like make sure that like AI is not building them a fancy website that’s actually trash?

Josh Klemons: You know, I think that’s the question.
Jack Welty: Yeah. Yeah.
Josh Klemons: That’s that’s the million-dollar question right there,
Jack Welty: And and I think that’s that’s the shift to the role of manager and critic. You know what I mean? Like we’re we we are not just shipping pure AI driven,
Josh Klemons: right?
Jack Welty: you know, creations. We are asking follow-up questions. we are pushing AI to prove itself to prove those process steps to verify its work in a whole bunch of ways. I mean it’s why you’ve seen AI uh advance so quickly in software engineering because those outputs are so much more verifiable like you can test the API that you’ve built and it either works or it
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: doesn’t. Um whereas for something like analysis um you can’t you know prove that the conclusion of
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: the analysis is right without fully inspecting all the outputs. So, I mean, that’s even a tip for I think AI use is is make these things explain to you what they did um and produce intermediate artifacts and present to you a plan for what they’re going to do before they go to do it.

Jack Welty: Which again is the type of thing that if it was an intern’s first day and you told an intern to go write a report,
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: you wouldn’t say like, “Hey buddy, like have a good day. Come back to me at 5 when the report’s done.” You would say like, “Hey, no, like first you should gather this this particular data here.
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: You should analyze it in this way and then you should check in with me once you’ve done that before I send you off to go write the memo or
Josh Klemons: As somebody who’s very publicly like building AI tools for the party, I assume you’re having these conversations.
Jack Welty: whatever.
Josh Klemons: Do you find that folks are having to learn that they they need to focus on process? uh like are most folks jumping in and saying write me a report to cla or chat GPT or do they recognize that that’s not how it works?
Jack Welty: Yeah, it’s a good question. I think everyone goes on their own journey. Um, I think there is there’s certainly I think folks approach it from a couple different directions.

Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Jack Welty: Both are totally valid. Like I you watch people um maybe dive in a little bit too deep and get really excited about the hype and then have to kind of pull themselves back. Um and on the flip side, you have uh folks that are, you know, totally justifiable skeptics for whatever reasons that take a sort of slower approach. And you’ll see those folks um I think advance more deliberately and maybe a little bit more carefully through all the steps of verification before they get to a final
Josh Klemons: Okay. No. Uh,
Jack Welty: output.
Josh Klemons: super interesting. So, let’s talk Caucus AI. Um, tell us about Caucus AI. Like, I I poked around on the site quite a bit. Uh, I read the about section. Um, like what does it do? Why’ you build it? Like, tell us the story behind it.
Jack Welty: Yeah. So, um, uh, Caucus AI, Caucus-ai.com, um, is a product of myself and and Meg Schwenfire, who’s my colleague from the the Harris campaign.

Jack Welty: Um, you know, a AI is replacing search. Um, millions of Americans now ask uh chat bots the questions that they used to type into Google or they still type those questions into Google and they get an AI summary instead. Um, and so uh we realized that there was no one really systematically capturing and measuring what these things were saying about um uh about political candidates or in response to political questions. Um and so you know being the good analysts that we are uh we just started by collecting data. Um so Caucus AI monitors right now three different chat bots across we have about 1100 races in the tool right now. Um we ask um an election level question just like purely factual who’s running for governor in Maryland. Um and then we ask a handful of questions about each candidate in the race. So, um, a generic bio question, a question about where they stand on issues, and then a question about their top criticisms. Um, and then we sort of present all of that data, uh, in our website.

Jack Welty: Um but then we’re also doing a whole bunch of research uh on that data that we’ve collected and and publishing that on our substack.
Josh Klemons: So you found that which chatbot a voter uses um determines which media like essentially it matters right like and it goes without saying like if you’re asking Grock which is like Elon Twitter’s you
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: know AI you’re going to get a different response than if you ask cla Gemini or chatpt so like how different are the responses like what are you finding when it comes to like these different
Jack Welty: Yeah. So the the biggest difference is in the media ecosystems.
Josh Klemons: models
Jack Welty: So most of the responses are broadly factual. We are not finding um that anyone is like totally off the deep end. Um even even Grock Grock is uh unsurprisingly uh quicker to site
Josh Klemons: even
Jack Welty: the controversies uh about a political candidate. Um and Grock is actually on on either side.
Josh Klemons: on either side of the aisle or mostly just de Okay,
Jack Welty: It’s it’s still kind of early days in our research.

Josh Klemons: cool.
Jack Welty: Um, we also these things are changing rapidly all the time.
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Jack Welty: So, we’re going to be collecting these responses, you know, at least monthly through the election. So, I do think it’s possible we see things start to change as we get closer to November. Um, but uh, yeah, Grock is actually so the the media ecosystems and and and who gets cited is probably the biggest difference. Um, Grock is the only large model that we see citing social media. So obviously it sites sites Twitter um but it also sites in No Grock
Josh Klemons: only Twitter, right? It’s not citing anything.
Jack Welty: sites Grock sites Facebook Grock sites Instagram Grock sites LinkedIn um there’s actually
Josh Klemons: What? That’s
Jack Welty: a pretty wide variety of sources.
Josh Klemons: wild.
Jack Welty: Um Chatpt so OpenAI’s model um really leans in on their big national media partnerships. So OpenAI and Axios have a deal same with Washington Post with AP. So um Chetchup Tea is much much much more likely to site those new sources first um before going anywhere else.

Jack Welty: Um and then Gemini casts a much wider net. So for the average query, you know, Gemini sites like twice as many sources. Uh Gemini is quicker to site local news, stuff like that.
Josh Klemons: Is there a reason you didn’t include Claude? Is it more complicated or it just didn’t seem as relevant as the other three?
Jack Welty: When we started the project, Claude had like low low singledigit consumer US market share. Um, I think the thing to remember is like, yes, a lot of us wonky white collar knowledge workers are using COD, but your average American when they think about asking a chatbot political questions, they’re just using chat GPT. Um,
Josh Klemons: Got
Jack Welty: so we’ll probably add COD to our analysis.
Josh Klemons: it.
Jack Welty: Um, especially it it has risen in popularity in the last couple months with all the the DoD drama and whatnot. Um, but like 80% of US consumers are using Chachi.
Josh Klemons: Right. So talk to us about the uh experiment you ran with chat GPT and a brand new Wikipedia
Jack Welty: Yeah. So um you know we created cog one you know we just wanted to measure what these things were saying but
Josh Klemons: page.
Jack Welty: uh all with the goal of understanding how can we affect these responses how do they vary um what is actually getting cited. So we conducted an experiment um you know Wikipedia is one of the largest sources of these answers. Wikipedia and ballot pedia are sort of the top two for lots of these models. Um, and we created Wikipedia pages for a couple of lesserk known Senate candidates in like uncompetitive states. Um, we followed all of Wikipedia’s rules. They met Wikipedia’s notability guidelines and they were like balanced, neutral Wikipedia pages that just cited uh sort of local news stories. Um, and I think the the big headline finding is it took just 12 minutes from the publishing of that Wikipedia page for it start starting to show up in chat answers. And as soon as Chat was citing the brand new Wikipedia page, twothirds of all of the the sources it cited in its answers were that Wikipedia page.

Jack Welty: And we found verbatim sentences from the Wikipedia page that we had just written uh you know hours before showing up in you know a completely unauthenticated new chatbt request for answers about this candidate. So um yeah I
Josh Klemons: Wow. So, Wikipedia polices itself, right? So, like in theory,
Jack Welty: mean
Josh Klemons: Wikipedia should never have like bad actors. Like, yes, it could exist for a few minutes, but it’s not going to exist for months because somebody’s going to catch it. But what you’re saying is like there are ways like ChatBT is definitely manipulatable. Like, that is clear. And if you’re winning the Wikipedia fight, then you’re winning the Chat GPT fight. So are talk to us about misinformation. Like are how worried are you about bad actors?
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: And are there any ways that like us as a party can better inoculate ourselves uh from those bad actors? Or is Wiki is Wikipedia essentially should we all just be donating more money to Wikipedia to protect elections forever?

Jack Welty: I I certainly think we should be grateful. you know, thank your local Wikipedia editor when you get a chance.
Josh Klemons: Seriously. Yeah.
Jack Welty: Um, uh, but I do think, you know, it it speaks to, uh, some of the both speed and opacity of these systems uh, that we don’t we don’t even really know what search index Chatt uses uh, to find this stuff. We know that right now at least it thinks Wikipedia is really trustworthy and so if you can change Wikipedia, you can show up there. But that’s not to say that that won’t change over time. Um I, you know, we have not found a ton of factual inaccuracies yet. Um but I think we are we are really in the early days here of folks trying to influence these. Um, I I think we don’t yet know if the other side is is going to, you know, create tons of astroturf Red Reddit posts to edit to to change one of these responses or, you know, push a ton of YouTube shorts to change the Gemini responses.

Jack Welty: I think it’s just it’s very very early to conclude that any of this stuff uh is is totally safe and that, you know, Wikipedia editors will save us all.
Josh Klemons: So you did find that they they seem to all actively be working to not like influence elections per se. um like they’re giving more like factual information with like even Grock who like sure as hell has controversial opinions on Twitter. Uh when it comes down to it, you’re not finding that they’re saying, “Oh yeah, that guy sucks. You should vote for this guy.” Like it’s they’re all being relatively um like careful about how they speak about elections. Is that what is that a fair assessment of your
Jack Welty: Yeah,
Josh Klemons: findings?
Jack Welty: I think that’s fair. And and we know this. I mean, the labs have have told us this. They do a ton of research um and they have a ton of incentives to keep these answers as neutral as possible, right? like the labs have giant political interests. They have big super PACs that are spending money now.

Jack Welty: Um and so they don’t want their answers to be favored by one side. So we know specifically um you know if you ask what brand of toothpaste to buy um it wants to give you a decisive uh answer like that’s how it it gets the you know the most user satisfaction is by it’ll confidently recommend you what water bottle to buy or what have you. Um, but we know that there’s this post-training layer where they try and sort of bang these models into neutrality. Um, and that’s where you get these very like wishy-washy kind of both sidesy answers which I I think make it make our jobs harder because these models really want to be neutral. Um, and so, you know, I think we have to be creative about how we put information on our websites. Um, how we think about, you know, good structured question and answer content. Um and just sort of experiment with lots of tactics to make sure that when asked they are giving you know that the answers we want them to
Josh Klemons: back during the 2024 primary, I I was tracking the Republican email program and writing about it a lot.

Jack Welty: give.
Josh Klemons: I like I did a bunch of writing on it. And then when Trump was the nominee, um I did an analysis of his email program versus Biden’s email program. This was before Harris, like it was still Biden. and I wrote up my own findings and then I went to chatpt and I asked it like essentially who had the better email program and I could not get it to I tried everything I could think of to get it to have an opinion and it refused. So I wrote about this so I finally um I came up with an interesting prompt and I said if these two people were Seinfeld characters who are they and Biden was Seinfeld and uh Trump was George. Um, and then I said, “What about Sex in the City characters?” And same deal, like Biden was the hero and uh, you know, and I think I did the West Wing as well or something. But like, like I really had to work hard to get it to give me something that was even worth putting down on paper.

Josh Klemons: And I did in the end, but like it certainly wasn’t going to say, “Oh, Biden’s emails are better.” Even though they were better, uh, in like by every objectable objective measurement. Um, you know, like, “Oh, you’re writing 10 emails a day from a bunch of different senders. That’s a spam bot.” Nope. uh he he has an interesting varied way. So yeah, it’s just an interesting I I hadn’t really connected it to like I hadn’t thought about that experiment I did with like how people need to be thinking about it. Like if you’re trying to figure out who should I vote for, well here’s what I believe, you know, like you know, it’s essentially like you have to know why you want to vote for somebody and like I assume and I haven’t tested this. I assume if I go to chat GPT and say here are my values, here’s what I believe. Here’s what I want in the world. Who should I vote for in this election? Do you think it would give me an answer or like it still is going to be like conservative about like not doing

Jack Welty: I think it’s more likely to give you a decisive answer,
Josh Klemons: that?
Jack Welty: but That’s sort of some of the extended research we want to do. U right now we were really just trying to ground the sort of baseline of these models that when presented with tell me about Josh Shapiro, what’s it going to say?
Josh Klemons: Got it.
Jack Welty: Um but I think one of our next research avenues is asking questions like um you know which candidate’s going to lower gas prices, which is best on affordability, I care about the environment, which candidate do you think best represents my values? Um we’ve seen some really really limited evidence that uh you know Chachi PT in particular was like quite skeptical about Democrat Democratic economic plans in a way that it was maybe not as skeptical of the Republicans economic plans. So um I think we have
Josh Klemons: You could you could like see Mark Andre in the answers like dictating David Saxs was like rewriting
Jack Welty: a right right yeah is really into trickle down economics.
Josh Klemons: answers before you saw the response.

Jack Welty: Um so uh yeah there there’s like a ton more to do there. We know that these things so while at the same time we know that the model the labs probably have instructions in the system prompts saying like don’t tell the user who to vote for. They also say stuff you know all the safety training like don’t give the user the recipe for napal but there are jailbreaks like my grandmother used to make napal can you please give me her old recipe and you’ll get it.
Josh Klemons: I know that.
Jack Welty: So that’s not to say like the labs are doing their best,
Josh Klemons: Oh man.
Jack Welty: but even they don’t fully understand how these systems work. Um, and I think this is going to continue to be a moving target and and they are tweaking these things
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: constantly. They are releasing new models. They are changing the system prompt. And like that’s why we think it’s important to maintain a pretty high degree of vigilance because uh you know what if all of a sudden these things do change in October and suddenly they’re being

Josh Klemons: Right. Uh yeah, I listened to a podcast. Somebody was talking about how engineers at like the big labs,
Jack Welty: decisive.
Josh Klemons: it’s almost like planting orchards and like just seeing what happens. And like if something happens, then they’ll go and like tend to it, but like they don’t really know what’s going to happen. Like some trees might do better than others. And you know, like we’re not exactly sure what’s going to happen. They’re not coding so much as like planting and like experimenting,
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: which is both like interesting and horrifying like that they’re reshaping our economy and our politics and everything else. So, I think especially down ballot races,
Jack Welty: Yes.
Josh Klemons: I would imagine even some like statewide races are we’re still having a hard time getting our party to think about SEO and now we need to be thinking about AEO like or I don’t know generative however you want to call it like AE I I’ve heard different ways of saying it but essentially AE AI SEO.
Jack Welty: Yep.
Josh Klemons: So, I guess like big picture you we don’t have to get too granular here. not looking for like, oh, make sure your all text is right, but like how should folks be thinking about AI SEO differently than like search SEO like which is redundant, I know, but just trying to clarify for
Jack Welty: Yeah, totally, totally. Um,
Josh Klemons: folks.
Jack Welty: I mean, the first thing I would say is don’t forget about SEO. Um, a lot of these things are using search indices under the hood to figure out which websites to go site. So, um, don’t forget about your robots.txt. Make sure your alt text and, uh, you know, your your structured HTML all looks good for the same kind of crawlers. Like, we we do have some findings that that stuff matters. Um, and we’ve even found candidate sites that have, you know, intentionally or otherwise blocked AI crawlers in their robots.txt. Um, yes, if you’re writing a blog, maybe you don’t want Sam Alman to index your posts and feed it into your training data, but I think if you’re running for Senate, you probably do.

Jack Welty: So, I would make sure you have you have those settings tuned, right? Um,
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: in terms of the the AEO question, um, what we found so far is they really like structured data. They like question and answer formats. Um,
Josh Klemons: Yeah. Define structured data.
Jack Welty: so the more
Josh Klemons: So it’s not like a long blog post. It’s like a series of I mean FAQs would be like an example. What’s another example of structured data that like chat GPT or Gemini is going to like cling to?
Jack Welty: FAQs are perfect structured issue pages. Um,
Josh Klemons: Got
Jack Welty: you want to make sure that if uh somebody asks Chat GPT about your position on environmental issues that
Josh Klemons: it.
Jack Welty: there’s an easy answer in your words on your website that that they can pull from. Um I think the other big finding that was um not counterintuitive but um you know cuts against a little bit of you know how we run modern campaigns um was the importance of official sites.

Jack Welty: Um the if you’re you know advising or working on an incumbent campaign the model see that.gov domain and instantly associate that with an authoritative source. So, um, for folks again that are running as incumbents, make sure that you’re not neglecting your official site totally in favor of your campaign site and that it’s not just, you know, a graveyard of press releases, but that it has a good updated bio and some good accomplish like some structured data. List your, you know, top 10 accomplishments in Office and why they matter.
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Jack Welty: um uh you know to the extent all of that is sort of allowable on your official site but um uh they really like those pages and we see those pages get cited for in comments a lot more than campaign sites.
Josh Klemons: Gov gets excited more than okay.
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: That like that alone is like a massive reminder because I live in this world. I think about this stuff all the time and I don’t think about that at all. Like because I’m not legally allowed to touch the.gov stuff,

Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: but that doesn’t mean I can’t recommend to the candidate that like, hey, you should probably have your staff in the building rework your site to be like up todate. Like I noticed you haven’t updated your site in four years. Maybe you should like Wikipedia you can’t necessarily edit. Like you know that’s complicated.
Jack Welty: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: Ballad Pedia you can and a lot of folks don’t but like you can but then.gov like that if you’re an incumbent you absolutely can and I think a lot of people don’t. So that’s that’s a huge like that alone is like a giant thing that I think most campaigns are not doing and should be. It looked like you had something to add on
Jack Welty: Yeah. Well, I was just going to big plus one to Valipedia.
Josh Klemons: Balladedia.
Jack Welty: So folks don’t know there’s those candidate surveys on ballot pedia that is your owned property. If you are the candidate you can tell about you can prove to balloted you are who you say you are and you get to fill out that candidate survey with your information.

Jack Welty: A lot of times you’ll see only like lesser known candidates third party candidates fill those out. I think it’s really important that our candidates fill that out. We are seeing ballot pedia as like the number two or three most cited um source across a lot of these answers. I think some of the labs even have relationships with balopedia that they can license that data.
Josh Klemons: What?
Jack Welty: Um so to the extent uh you know your your comm’s research and policy team sign off like please fill out those candidate surveys. I think that’s a great way to put in the models sources some sort of like you know uh objective you know truthful content out
Josh Klemons: I work a ton of down ballot races and I care about ballotedia.
Jack Welty: there.
Josh Klemons: I use it as a user, but like I also know that the average voter doesn’t care about ballot pedia and I had not thought like prior to like reading your paper. It had not occurred to me how important it was because it’s not really relevant for SEO.

Josh Klemons: I mean, it will come up like if you search, but like I feel like most people aren’t going to even click on it if that’s like if it’s Wikipedia and valipia, they’re going to Wikipedia. And if it’s Ballopedia and a website, they’re going to go to the website. But if Gemini or Chat GPT are pulling from there, it doesn’t matter if they click or not, they should be going there. So yeah, that’s another like big reminder for folks like Balipedia matters a lot more today than it did three years ago. And I mean I use Valipedia all the time, but like it matters more for like reaching your voters than it did a couple years ago because they’re finding it via cloud or whatever. That’s wild. Um, okay. You address the environmental argument uh about AI in your paper. uh the idea that progressives quote shouldn’t be using AI because of its energy footprint. What’s your response to
Jack Welty: Yeah. I mean, there’s a ton of research on this. I don’t pretend to be an expert.

Josh Klemons: that?
Jack Welty: um uh that says you know your average consumer user uh of any of these tools is a really really really marginal drop in the bucket of the footprint of these tools. Um so I I am not uh you know worried about my own personal use. Um and then I think the other argument that we would posit is um you know if we want to force the labs to adhere to good environmental policies and make sure that we are responsibly building out this infrastructure then we’re going to need to win elections and be in positions of power to to do so. Um so uh I I I don’t want our side to stray away from these tools because of these ethical concern ethical or moral concerns and then lose the opportunity to sort of enact the policy change that we think we need uh in order to produce good
Josh Klemons: So I mean that leads right next to my next question.
Jack Welty: outcomes.
Josh Klemons: Like there’s a real tension in the paper between like Democrats need to adopt these tools now and these tools are owned by companies with their own political interests which we know do not you could say don’t always or even don’t often align with ours.

Josh Klemons: So how do you square that circle? And you sort of just gave the answer is like we need to be in power so we can regulate them. Is that the answer? Like use them because it helps us win elections and then we turn around and regulate the hell out of them or do you have like a bigger approach to how you’re thinking about
Jack Welty: Um, I think that’s the fundamental approach. I mean,
Josh Klemons: this?
Jack Welty: I I think this technology is going to produce like wide ranging potentially earthshattering impacts on our society that I would like our side to be in the driver’s seat to help figure out the appropriate policy responses. um on the big tech concerns more specifically like you know we don’t not run Facebook ads we don’t not run Google ads like a lot of these are the same organizations that we’re talking about that um you know I think we have to make the uh we have to make the political sort of calculus decision that um you know I don’t think any of us like paying Mark Zuckerberg money um but if we need to reach the voters we need to reach in order to win the election like we’ll happily sign up uh to pay meta ads to do

Josh Klemons: I run a ton of meta ads for a ton of clients and I train on meta ads and I always say I think meta is an evil company but it wins elections and like until that changes is like I I see no alternative but to like spend it I spend so much money on meta because it keeps winning elections and yeah it’s it’s it’s hard to live in
Jack Welty: Sorry.
Josh Klemons: the modern world you know it’s hard to like like this small group of like tech companies that are like ruling us all but
Jack Welty: I
Josh Klemons: like we have to live in the like I’m using my Mac computer despite the fact that I’m very uncomfortable with Apple’s politics these days like I don’t know how to get around that. So I think that’s a fair answer for the the AI tools as well.
Jack Welty: A lot of us are advocates of campaign finance reform and we still support super PACs.
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: Like they’re just we have to win elections to be able to change these things.
Josh Klemons: Right.
Jack Welty: And I think this is another one of those instances.
Josh Klemons: Uh if you could get every Democratic campaign manager in the country to do one thing differently tomorrow, what is it?
Jack Welty: I would get them to write uh an AI use policy for their organization and create spaces where their staffers can share with one another how they’re using AI. Um because their staffers are using AI. They’re using JGBT on their phones. They’re using it on their personal computers to get work done. Uh and I think that sort of like shadow AI is unsafe and leads to worse work. Um, you’re going to learn a lot more about how to use these tools effectively if you and the person sitting next to you can collaborate
Josh Klemons: Interesting.
Jack Welty: safely on approved uses than if everyone is kind of using AI in a background tab and trying to hide it from their information technology department. So, um,
Josh Klemons: Interesting.
Jack Welty: that’s what I would get every every manager to
Josh Klemons: you should put out a blog post on what those look like.

Jack Welty: do.
Josh Klemons: I bet that would be very helpful. Uh, so I I’ve heard a lot of blog posts you should write based on this conversation. Maybe those are in the work. That’s how I think about the world is blog post. So, are there any campaigns you’re seeing do anything innovative with AI right now or is it like too soon to look at it that way?
Jack Welty: It’s kind of too soon and I have to imagine that the ones that are doing good things um probably aren’t going to tell us about it until after the midterms.
Josh Klemons: Got it. Because we’re not talking about generative here.
Jack Welty: Um uh yeah,
Josh Klemons: talking about like processes and
Jack Welty: that’s I mean again I think a lot of the really big gains are behind the scenes are back office.
Josh Klemons: whatnot.
Jack Welty: I don’t think we’re going to win elections by um yeah, just like AI generating more campaign ads.
Josh Klemons: AI swaps, right?
Jack Welty: Like I think we’re gonna we’re just going to run a faster,

Josh Klemons: Exactly.
Jack Welty: better, more efficient campaigns uh with the resources that we have. And so, you know, hopefully we find out uh uh after November how it’s going for
Josh Klemons: Uh what’s caucus AI?
Jack Welty: folks.
Josh Klemons: What’s one Caucus AI finding that you wish was getting more attention than it
Jack Welty: I think the big one for me um is that we’re able to to prove that getting your
Josh Klemons: is?
Jack Welty: website cited matters. Um so we can look at the similarity between chat’s responses and your website and when chat looks at your website um the answers look uh more like the content you want to be putting out into the

Josh Klemons: Cool.
Jack Welty: world. Um, so everything you can do to get your your site uh in those responses is is better for your campaign.
Josh Klemons: Uh, how can folks connect with you and keep up with your work and all the many blog posts that are coming
Jack Welty: Yes, you can check us out on
Josh Klemons: soon?
Jack Welty: caucus-ai.com. Um, that has the full website. Uh, all you know, 1100 races we’re tracking. We update that monthly. We just added issues and criticisms questions. Um, and we’re going to publish, uh, you know, a blog post of a bunch of our initial findings on those issues, questions very soon. So, you can link to our our Substack and subscribe um, from the Caucus
Josh Klemons: and I’ll have that in the show notes.
Jack Welty: site.
Josh Klemons: And are you on social or like you’re on LinkedIn or just find you at Caucus AI?
Jack Welty: Yeah, find us at Caucus AI. Um, I’m on Twitter, I’m on LinkedIn. Um, feel free to drop me a note.

Jack Welty: Uh, we are really in in early days of this research. We are looking for folks to partner on experiments. um if you’re going to change something about your web presence or your media strategy, um let us know. We’d love to measure uh your AI SEO before and after uh and see if we can detect an effect. Um and then yeah, otherwise if you want to chat about AI on campaigns or sort of where this world is going. Um I’m also Jack camelback.te,
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Jack Welty: drop me a line.
Josh Klemons: And yeah, all those links will be in the show notes. Thank you so much. This was, like I said, I I think about this stuff all the time and I have a lot of new ideas here and like a lot of new ways to think about stuff. So yeah, I’m sure it was helpful for me, so I’m sure it was helpful for others. So I really appreciate your time.
Jack Welty: Awesome. Thank you..

May 19, 2026/0 Comments/by Josh Klemons
https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Are-Democrats-Ready-for-Our-First-Truly-AI-Election-jack-welty.jpg 1080 1080 Josh Klemons https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Reverbal-Communications-Josh-Klemons.svg Josh Klemons2026-05-19 11:17:412026-05-19 11:17:42Are Democrats Ready for Our First Truly AI Election? with Jack Welty | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 53
Hello Merge Tag, Politics

Democrats Don’t Have a Tactics Problem. We Have a Strategy Problem. With Murshed Zaheed | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 52

“It doesn’t matter if Democratic senators or members of Congress put out TikTok videos or bring influencers for special hearings. Ultimately, if it’s not in their bones that they want to fight with everything they have, the people will see right through it.”

Murshed Zaheed has more than 30 years of experience as a leader, organizer, and advocate in a career stretching from D.C. to San Francisco. He’s the founder of Pacifica Strategies, a boutique public affairs firm working with prominent organizations engaged in policy and politics.

He served as the Political Director of CREDO Mobile, empowering its over five million members to fight for progressive change in Washington, D.C., and in state capitols across the country.

He also served as Director of New Media for then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in a senior leadership role and was a member of Gov. Howard Dean’s groundbreaking digital team during Dean’s presidential campaign.

He has watched the Democratic Party cycle through the same conversations about tactics — from blogs in 2006 to TikTok in 2026 — and he’s tired of it.

Not because tactics don’t matter. But because tactics without strategy are just noise.

We covered a lot of ground — from what Harry Reid’s war room actually looked like from the inside, to why Congressional staffers quitting Bluesky is exactly the wrong response to getting yelled at online, to how the Dean campaign’s approach to email was the soul of what we’ve since lost.

Some top takeaways:

  • Strategy first, always. You cannot layer better tactics on top of a weak political position and expect people not to notice.
  • Democratic leaders need to stop treating their email lists as ATMs and start treating them as communities worth actually communicating with.
  • Getting yelled at online is not a reason to log off. It’s a reason to show up more and listen harder.
  • The Dean campaign raised $55 million with a blend of communications, organizing, and fundraising anchored in a real political position. That model exists. We abandoned it.
  • Indivisible is one of the only progressive organizations whose emails Murshed actually reads. Pretty sure he’s not the only one.

Listen to the full episode right here, or wherever you stream podcasts.

If you prefer video, you can also watch our full conversation:

Find all episodes at HelloMergeTag.com or wherever you stream podcasts.

Links

Murshed’s Bluesky and LinkedIn

Pacifica Strategies

Murshed’s Writings

Democrats Need A Battle Plan—And A War Room

About some Congressional Democrats’ frustrations with Bluesky

About diminishing digital reach of progressive powerhouse groups

Referenced Episodes

How Did Democratic Fundraising Get So Problematic, And Where Do We Go From Here? With Josh Nelson | Ep. 15

Running a Bluesky-First Campaign with Kat Abughazaleh | Ep. 32

Checking Back In With Kat Abughazaleh | Ep. 42

Additional Resources

X-Last Strategy from Indivisible

 

Big thanks to our sponsors:

Civic Shout. Learn more about the great work they’re doing to help Democratic campaigns and progressive nonprofits build their lists ethically at civicshout.com/partners.

 

Episode Transcript

This transcript was automatically generated and has not been copy-edited. While it can serve as a helpful guide to our conversation, it may contain errors or omissions. For the most accurate representation, we recommend listening to (or watching) the full episode.

Josh Klemons: Murshed Zaheed has more than 30 years of experience as a leader, organizer, and advocate in a career stretching from DC to San Francisco. He’s the founder of Pacifica Strategies, a boutique public affairs firm working with prominent organizations engaged in policy and politics. He served as the political director of Credo Mobile, empowering its over 5 million members to fight for progressive change in Washington DC and in state capitals across the country. He also served as director of new media for then Senate majority leader Harry Reid in a senior and leadership role and was a member of Governor Howard Dean’s groundbreaking digital team during Dean’s very famous presidential campaign.

Josh Klemons: So Murshed, thank you so much for coming on the pod. One month into Trump’s second term, you wrote a piece called Democrats need a battle plan and a war room. And in it, you argued that Democrats don’t just have a tactic problem tactics. Uh, we also have a strategy problem and that no amount of better spokespeople or snappier Tik Tok videos was going to matter if party leaders hadn’t committed to actually being an opposition party. Um, how are we doing? It’s been a year since you wrote that piece, a year in change. Are we any closer to your vision? Or are we further away? Uh, I’d love to hear your take.
Murshed Zaheed: You know, I I will come in with a glass half full kind of take today. I I I do think since I wrote uh when I wrote that piece about a year ago, things looked really dire. I I felt things were very dire. I I thought the party looked um uh extremely rudderless, right? It looked like it was going uh uh it was sort of floating around without any kind of direction.

Murshed Zaheed: I and and the reason I wrote that post uh or wrote wrote down those reflections and huge thanks to uh uh Brian Pitler who hosted that uh who posted that as a guest post on his well- read u blog called off message.
Josh Klemons: Off message for
Murshed Zaheed: I recommend I I recommend everyone reading it uh every morning for for their for
Josh Klemons: sure.
Murshed Zaheed: their sanity is uh is because what I felt like the Democratic party leadership were have been suffering from an issue and not just Democratic party leadership but I think progressive establishment at large has been suffering for a long time is where they get too infused and enamored with tactics without really thinking about strategy. Right. This is this is a simple dichotomy that uh the distinction between strategy and tactics. It’s uh it but it is fundamental to everything that we have seen transpire in our world and when after the and what happens after every elections when especially when uh the winning side gets to tell all the stories right and after the 2024 election uh uh elections or debacle or whatever you want to call it right the uh the the
Josh Klemons: Nightmare. Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: nightmare We kept hearing one theories after another. How the Republicans dominated the manosphere. Obviously, Democrats were divided over foreign policy issues. Joe uh the consternation with uh consternation with Joe Biden and also how Republicans have been running labs around Democrats uh when it comes to digital comms uh uh the world of digital comms and and and and in reaction you you start reading sort of content in um in in the world of I want to call practitioners media like the the the the uh the media uh the lobby outlets in DC where reporters get you know reporters are I I you know sadly I will I will say it often times are are the ones who really get enamored with tactics right they they will they then they will uh reach out to Democratic operatives you know wouldn’t it more sense if you know how how come Democrats are not been gone on podcast as I’m here on a podcast or how uh uh uh you know if only they did more like videos or something along those lines lives.

Josh Klemons: That’s
Murshed Zaheed: You know, it’s it’s a conversation that we heard like 15 20 years ago. Uh and I know I I will say uh uh I’m going to go on a I’m going to go into the weeds a little bit, Josh,
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: and I promise I’m going to bring it back.
Josh Klemons: We like the weeds here. For
Murshed Zaheed: I’m going to bring it back.
Josh Klemons: sure.
Murshed Zaheed: Uh so about 20 uh uh I think it was 20 2024. Yeah. So 21 uh 20 so 22 years ago about 22 years ago actually almost 22 years ago I um the dean campaign ended and I moved back to
Josh Klemons: Kev
Murshed Zaheed: DC and then I took a job at an organization called Common Cause. I think a lot of probably your listeners know that. And my first job title there was director of online strategy. And this was 2004. Right? And I’m like, I look at my business card. I’m like, hey,
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: what am I doing with my life?

Murshed Zaheed: You know, what what does this mean? But but the one of the reasons I I got that job because my then boss uh Shelley Pingri, who was now an awesome congresswoman from Maine,
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: was like, yeah. Uh uh she had said like Michelle, you know, I uh love the work you all did at the Dean campaign. We also want to think about the same approaches in terms of building online communities of activists and and and and and sort of refurbish common causes
Josh Klemons: That’s
Murshed Zaheed: uh uh online communication, strategic communication sounds good. But I remember going into various DC places at that time, you know, you would have things like I would hear from people, oh, we just have to block it out. Block the content out. Oh, we need animations. because animation was like a big big thing at that time, you know. So those those those cry is not any different than what we hear now, right? What the the common thread there is everyone is enamored with tactics.

Murshed Zaheed: The actual part of how to uh what to push out. But when it comes down to it, it it really is about strategy. What is the position you want to take? And so when I wrote that piece and I told you I would bring it back in uh about a year ago, there was really no direction that I was sensing from the Democratic party as the opposition. They they they they uh uh um there was good number of pe senators were still going along and voting yes on a lot of Trump nominations, right? And then we saw the whole debacle around government shutdown fight that happened last year and it was unclear if uh then the Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer was really tr truly committed to a unified opposition. Right? When you have when you’re not committed, when your when your fundamental core is not strong in terms of how you want to
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: set yourself as an opposition party or how relentless and fierce you want to be that impacts whether you are going to be able to go out in various digital platform and communicate, right?

Murshed Zaheed: So what so what I was trying to say is it doesn’t matter uh if Democratic senators or members of Congress put out Tik Tok videos or bring influencers for special hearings or something along the line. Ultimately, if it’s not in their bones that they want to fight with everything they have, the people will see right through it. and that’s why they’re going to get push backs or eye rolls when they come to those platforms and get ratioed or whatn not accordingly. But if you go back differently and you really fight the Republicans and really fight with the tenacity and be fearless about it and actually be on opposition voting, people will respond to it. And I think we have seen that. We have seen some elements of it the last two, three months. I think I would say the congressional Democrats have done a really good job in recent months in pushing back uh specifically following uh the tragedy in Minnesota and in holding firm in terms uh of letting telling Republicans that they are not going to appropriate one another another dollar for um the ICE or CPP given that those agencies have already gotten tens of billion dollars from previous appropriation bills.

Murshed Zaheed: I think we see uh the Democratic Party completely unified in terms of how they’re pushing back against uh the current administration’s needless uh um and arguably lawless war that they’re waging in the Middle East. Just about an hour ago, less than an hour ago, there was a vote on the House floor where Iran war power uh resolution filled by one vote. And I have to say the good the democratic leadership there and um did a really great job
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: in terms of organizing the party and communicating accordingly. So I have seen some improvements there you know now is it but they still have a long way to
Josh Klemons: So,
Murshed Zaheed: go.
Josh Klemons: and that’s a helpful context I think. So, you think the strategy has improved? Do you think the tactics have
Murshed Zaheed: Uh it’s there’s tactics.
Josh Klemons: improved?
Murshed Zaheed: It’s unclear to me. I think uh uh I think there they they’re still behind. They they can still do more. Right. Um uh I think the now let’s let’s and it it all depends on what tactics you are talking about right it

Josh Klemons: Are are Democrats doing a good job of taking their newfound core strategy
Murshed Zaheed: Hey.
Josh Klemons: and helping people in like obvious so every time I see um polls Donald Trump is so underwater but Democrats are way worse you know it’s like are we like as we’ve sort of grown in
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: a I mean it sounds like you do think we’ve grown into an opposition party to a degree uh maybe there’s still room to go and I definitely want to talk about how Harry Reid What would Harry Reid be doing today that we’re not? But yeah, I am just curious like if you think like and maybe there’s no one answer like I certainly think you know Chris Van Holland like you talked about him in one of your pieces, you know, going to El Salvador that was like both strategy and tactic like he was able to get news that directly connected back to the story that we desperately needed to be talking about. Um I know there’s also been talk of having a daily press briefing that came up in one of your uh articles where it’s, you know, Pete Buddhajes or somebody like it.

Josh Klemons: uh the party does not seem to ha I mean it’s always the problem when you’re in the wilderness right when you don’t have a president you don’t have a party leader and I think we are struggling with that right now there is no one person who speaks for the party uh which makes it very hard to respond to like the daily horror that we’re seeing out of the Trump administration so let let’s pull it to Harry Reid so you argued in one of your pieces that like the model exists Harry Reid’s war room from 2005 really like changed the tone like the Bush administration was just you know running ramshot over the dems Harry Reid came in, he was a relatively soft-spoken, seemingly moderate, you know, guy. Nobody thought he was going to be this like progressive champion, but he understood that that’s not how you win. Like you you you know, you’ve got to have a stance. You can’t just be in the middle. Um, so talk to us about sort of like I was around at that time, but you know, like I wasn’t following that.

Josh Klemons: So like give us the context and how do you think Harry Reid would be responding to the to what’s going on today? Or is that like a fair question to ask in the context of the a world that’s so different than the one that he served
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah, I think it’s a really good question to ask. Um, you know, one of the first things that Senator Reid did,
Josh Klemons: in?
Murshed Zaheed: uh, was, again, again, this is going beyond tactics. And I’m going to, uh, invoke another, um, favorite senator of mine, Senator Elizabeth uh, Warren. You know,
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: one of her famous uh, saying is personnel is policy, right? I think you probably have heard that in some ways.
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: uh Senator Reid uh when he was building out this apparat uh apparatus uh leaned into that lean into that concept in a different way. Uh he uh when he was uh building out uh this war he brought in people that essentially reflected the actual Democratic party spectrum, right? He was not afraid to bring in I want to mention my my colleague Ari Rabenhaft uh who you pro I don’t know if you have heard his name but Ari

Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: is uh former deputy chief of staff uh for Senator Bernie Sanders and deputy campaign director.
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: uh are uh Ari is a legend in terms of uh Olgard internet organizers or whatnot um you know who they are and Ari actually has been working um I I’ll give him some credit he has been working in the Hungarian elections uh for
Josh Klemons: Ah, interesting.
Murshed Zaheed: the good guys right you know so so he’s he’s he’s fighting he’s always been fighting the good fight
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: and uh Reed brought in uh uh uh Reed’s chief of staff at that time was uh this woman named Susan McHugh who is incredible, brilliant, sharp. Uh she she was a former comm director. She knew to set up a war room and she had to make sure that it was touching all part of Democratic constituencies and at that part a key part of Democratic constituencies was net roots or the online blogger the blogersphere that was that was coming through. So she brought in people like Ari. She she she uh uh uh uh uh she uh she brought in folks who were doing the traditional media work.

Murshed Zaheed: She brought in f folks who were doing the traditional work of booking senators uh on on cable networks. But the thing that they did was they whenever the White House Bush White House went on a policy offensive, they responded with a fullcourt press everywhere every day. Right.
Josh Klemons: Thanks.
Murshed Zaheed: that that that and that meant not just shooting out press releases that meant like pushing out at that time uh you know post on Daily Coast I don’t know if you remember
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: Daily Coast they would have recommended diaries Senator Reed Ari his team Senator Reed would
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: post recommended post on Daily Coast diaries and you know what he would do not just post content they would engage in the comments even when they were getting push back on something or if somebody was not agreeing with them. And I think that’s something that uh what um the current if if I was running a war room in in the uh on on um in in Congress either on the House side or on the Senate side, we’d make sure that it was touching all parts of the Democratic constituents in including even the ones sometimes who may be skeptical about the strategy and tactics of of the Democra ocratic leadership.

Murshed Zaheed: It’s the only way you can sort of I feel like you can build an authentic and strong unified opposition when you engage all parts of it, you know. So that that just means not just pushing out press releases. You want to make sure that you want to have more most aggressive members on cable. You want to make obviously you want to make sure you do the video content but I also it also means you you use your email platforms email communities in a way so that it’s more than just a marketing uh marketing tool. Uh I think you’ll pro you probably have uh uh if one of the reasons I think when it comes to digital organizing digital comps uh you will see there uh there is skepticism that’s built in into the online world is when they see a Democrat do something or leadership do some things like oh here comes the email solicitations and text solicitations. s unwanted unasked without without any prompt but you never see you don’t see uh um I think it would be it would be ideal if we had this um democratic leaders were also using their email uh communities as uh as an effective tools to communicate at a massive level in terms of pushing out uh uh uh uh pu pushing out their key messages or key strategies or how they’re taking on taking on the administration.

Murshed Zaheed: We don’t see we don’t see much of that because that platform is essentially used as a mark they’re using it as a marketing tool. Um and also uh we don’t see the leadership engage with a progressive community that’s very online progressive community. That’s that’s fundament I think that’s one of the fundamental elements that was missing right you know we we have Netroots Nation coming up in about seven weeks right who
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: showed up in the first Netroots Nation even before it was Netroots Nation called Yearly Coast Senator Harry Reid he showed up in that
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: community embraced them and got them fired up even even though he there was a he knew knew there was a good there was a good chance people would ask him tough questions, put him put him he still came and figured out how to how to how to engage the community. Um would we uh are we going to um now fast forward 20 24 years later I can see there might be hesitation on the part of Hakee Jeff or or Chuck Schumer to come to a progressive conference because they they think they may get a hostile reception, right?
Murshed Zaheed: Or they may get a confrontational reception or they may get hard questions. I think they should invert that, you know. I think they should embrace the community and go into the lion’s den and tell them, “Okay, this is what we’re doing. You have ideas, let me hear you.” And sort of build that relationship. And I think it’s really important that they do that. But and they they still have a long way to go in in making that happen.
Josh Klemons: Do you think the Netroots community is um more less or the same amount of receptive to welcoming in somebody who they might be frustrated with on the national level to have those hard conversations today?
Murshed Zaheed: I think uh obviously there has been a lot of history and at this point I I think people are smarter in terms of the kind of questions they want to ask their leaders or whatn not but I think at the end of the day uh folks are most engaged uh in terms of consumer or political information and organ whether they’re communicating, organizing, donating or whatn not they understand the threat uh this country faces the threat that our democracy faces the stakes uh in the elections the vamper so at the end of the day I think if they have I think for every family it’s healthy to have tough conversations and talk it out and make the family stronger.

Murshed Zaheed: So I I I would advocate and encourage democratic leaders to think that think about that and think about that as one of their core strategies when they build their opposition and position themselves at the opposition party. the the best way to get buy in is to really engage the community in an authentic way laying out what the strategy is and and this is I that that leads to further complex questions about the strategy itself like who are they really answering to but but but it’s it’s good to have those tough conversations otherwise it’s going to be it’s going to be like
Josh Klemons: Uh what do you think the role is for activists um when the party or the movement like let’s go bigger than the Democratic party here?
Murshed Zaheed: This
Josh Klemons: Obviously like we the progressive movement are being failed and failing ourselves in whatever you want to call it. Uh, and I do agree like things are better today than they were a year ago, but like obviously we are still very much in the wilderness. What do you think the role is like talking about Harry Reid’s war room is very much a top down approach, which I understand was not his like his whole thing was building relationships.

Josh Klemons: So to say top down is maybe like a little bit too dismissive, but what do you think the role is of those activists of the influencers who have big audiences who are frustrated with the party? Should they be going after the party every day? Should they be keeping those conversations behind closed doors and trying to move them in the right direction or should they be openly, you know, like right now I think we have a lot of progressive activists who are very critical of the party which I’m not in favor of or against. I think it’s a case by case basis. But as a whole, do you think that that is helpful to move us forward or is it like making it harder for us to be able to build those kind of bridges where I’m not saying that Netroots needs to welcome Schumer or Jeff? But my guess is Schumer or Jeffre would not be interested in attending. maybe not net roots but certainly some spaces where they would not necessarily get a friendly um welcome. Is that your

Murshed Zaheed: I I think first of all I think it’s a really good good question Josh.
Josh Klemons: take?
Murshed Zaheed: Um it’s a great question and I think that that requires reflection. I think I I think a role of unhealthy and informed activism is to always push your leadership to uh towards the north star.
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: And I uh and I don’t know who’s who actually said it said it. It could be MLK Jr. but please fact check. I I get but I I felt like I heard this somewhere.
Josh Klemons: That’s
Murshed Zaheed: I it’s like it’s like when somebody is uh advocating very effectively it
Josh Klemons: okay.
Murshed Zaheed: he or she makes the people uncomfortable around around it. I think I’ve heard that effective ad advocacy means that people being uncomfortable. Now I’m going to if you want to look on the other side of the spectrum the right-wing the right-wing have never had any qualms about pushing their leadership right they are ruthless they go at it they are absolutely ruthless and they make no apologies in terms of what their demands

Josh Klemons: Ruthless.
Murshed Zaheed: are over the years NRA Heritage Foundation uh foundation have been absolutely ruthless in terms of coming down and going after moderate Republican leaderships or whatnot and they have and and you have seen the results the last last 30 40 years. No, I I think um u there there should there should be a a strong and hope robust left flank where organizations and activists push u their natural allies on the hill uh this will be the Democrats in a healthy way towards policy points they want them to get to and and I think sometimes they they should be ruthless about it. they should be strong about it and they should be a call out at it is but there’s also balance right I think there’s also need for uh u to be strategic there will be times where where you will have to have backroom discussions uh with the leadership and figure out what’s achievable and what’s
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: not and and this is where you need to have the honest conversation and I say this as somebody who’s been on the both ends of it you So when I worked at Reed’s office, I I would take incoming from a lot of my friends uh my dear friends in including um you know one time I took petition delivery who from Becky
Josh Klemons: I
Murshed Zaheed: Bond at Credo who later became my boss like four six five six years down the line but it was with you.
Josh Klemons: Just
Murshed Zaheed: I think you it’s important to have those back back-end conversations and then I think it is also important for uh progressives to understand like how at certain point they have gone front enough uh uh as far as they could take it but then throttle back and then focus your uh fire on on the bigger picture
Josh Klemons: heat.
Murshed Zaheed: and uh and and and and the more important opposition and then come back at it again. So there’s always a little bit of back and forth, but uh but I also think constant negative negativity is not
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: helpful either. Um I think if people follow my feed on blue sky, they will see I’m I’m pretty hard on Democrats uh a lot. You know, I I call it like it is some more than others,
Josh Klemons: Some more than others. And yes.
Murshed Zaheed: but at the same time, I’m I’m also sometimes the first ones to give them credit uh when they when they make the right move.

Murshed Zaheed: you know what when they hold firm and when when they listen when they listen to the activists. So I think it is also on the advocates from the outsides to be sharp and strategic and and understand what’s going on
Josh Klemons: Yeah. No.
Murshed Zaheed: inside.
Josh Klemons: Um, I really appreciate that and again it was a big question and it was based on what you were saying obviously like
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: um I think this is a running theme on this podcast is that like Republicans fund these movements and give them the um wiggle room to like really do whatever they want within a lot of you know some of them like Tucker Carlson seems to be like have his own audience but like certainly
Murshed Zaheed: No.
Josh Klemons: talking points USA is like you know there’s nothing grassroots about the beginning of talking points USA they could get away with saying things that like our activists cannot get away with. They’re journalists. Quote, I’m putting that in quotes. Um,
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: can get away with asking hard questions in a way that like, you know, you go on to a progressive media show, you expect a friendly interview.

Josh Klemons: And that makes it challenging because we do need to hold each other to account. And I think that we as a party are very our our donors want to see unonymity. That unonymity does not win elections. It does not move the needle. It does not win battles. Like we need a broad coalition of people. And obviously, we’re seeing this right now. Like I don’t know if you like have thoughts on this like third way saying that Dem shouldn’t talk to Assan per it’s like such an interesting we’re literally relitigating 2024 and it’s only 2026 you know it’s like it’s been literally 18 months since we had the fight about whether or not Dem should be going on the manosphere and like how we need our own Joe Rogan and I am in no way advocating that you know Hasan Piker is the voice of the party that I adhere to but he has a huge audience of people that look to him what is more in line with the next Joe Rogan and here we are debating debating whether or not it’s okay to go on his show.

Josh Klemons: So, part of me wonders if we’re just destined to fight the same fights over and over again until everything crumbles because like the fact that we are having this fight so soon after having the fight about how we need our own Joe Rogan and how we need to go on more podcasts, like it does make me worried that we have not learned enough lessons in the last 18 months. Uh, but I don’t know, maybe that’s overly pessimistic. You have any thoughts?
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah. Uh and and and is is it okay if I go a little bit deep on on on on this question?
Josh Klemons: Of course. Of
Murshed Zaheed: And you know,
Josh Klemons: course.
Murshed Zaheed: I will tell you I have not weighed in on on that issue anywhere.
Josh Klemons: You’re the first one who’s had an opportunity to talk about it on this spot.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: So,
Murshed Zaheed: I I I have not I have not I don’t think I have even done a single post on it
Josh Klemons: okay.
Murshed Zaheed: uh anywhere.
Josh Klemons: I didn’t see anything from you, but Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: Uh yeah the but I will tell you may maybe I’ll uh this is an opportunity to tell you a little bit of my journey of how I have ended up where I am.
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: The first internship so I I’m one of those people I love politics. I love policy. Uh I I always wanted to be in the world of public affairs and public service. You know I when I moved to America uh you know one of my identities I’m an immigrant right? I moved to US when I was 15. Uh I was so happy to move here with my parents and so I’m like wow I’m moving to somewhere with democracy where I can speak my mind I I can I can work on issues and I’m going to work on making world a better place right so I did the classic political work college democrat and all that so and then when I was a kid in college I went to do internship in DC my first internship in DC summer of 199 And again, I’m going to bring it back.

Murshed Zaheed: I promise. Summer of 1994 was an organization called the Democratic Leadership Council and their think tank called the Progressive Policy Institute,
Josh Klemons: Okay. Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: which is where third way came from.
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: Uh uh uh working on issues on why MAFTA is helpful for the country.
Josh Klemons: Gotcha.
Murshed Zaheed: My second internship, I love DC so much I came back for a second internship. My second internship was then late Senator Joel Lieberman’s
Josh Klemons: No.
Murshed Zaheed: office who is you know I had
Josh Klemons: You were just surrounded by centrists.
Murshed Zaheed: yeah centrist that that was sort of my beginning of my journey and and then and
Josh Klemons: Yeah. Interesting.
Murshed Zaheed: then and then from there on I became I went to law school became a labor lawyer and one and uh worked worked working with the dean campaign dean campaign was
Josh Klemons: Oh.
Murshed Zaheed: sort of like I want to, you know, I I don’t want to say you you go through radicalization, but you you you you go through enlightenment, right?

Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: Bush vore in 2000 was my first enlightenment because I was one of the I was one of the attorneys working in West Palm Beach taking depositions from old grandmas and I was
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: furious when the Democrats conceded that fight. I I felt like Senator Al Gore, Vice President Al Gore and and Joe Joe Lieberman conceded prematurely. And then Iraq was like my second moment. Iraq war in 200 uh 2003 when I saw in disbelief Democratic leadership in Congress just lay down and give B uh uh President Bush at that time Carter Blanch to to to launch his war. Um I uh so I you know like a lot of this lot of a lot of this conversations I I feel like maybe this I show my age. I feel like I’ve I’ve seen this so many times. It is what it is. Um I uh it is it is it is what it is.
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: I I I feel like I what I will say is this. I have kept my focus on work and issues that I can control on.

Murshed Zaheed: you know, I work on issues that every day that I feel are very important,
Josh Klemons: Good.
Murshed Zaheed: whether that’s on climate justice issues, on immigrant rights issues or whatnot. And I think a lot of times the discussions that happen in DC in organizations like Third Way or whatnot is is they they they set up conversation that’s really interesting for the DC elite media who love a good Democrat on Democrat Democrats and disarray stories and and
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: I feel like it’s strategic on my part in my little part in my little part if I don’t see into it and rather f yeah and and and and
Josh Klemons: Yeah. You moved as far away from DC as you could, right? San Francisco.
Murshed Zaheed: and rather focus on on things that is actually happening in front of us, right? I mean I I think what do people want to talk about?
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: People want to talk about where I am that gas is approaching seven bucks an hour. People people uh uh my fellow parents, you know, we see our grocery bills every every um every weekend when we go, you know, and I’m where it was a couple of years ago.

Murshed Zaheed: And you have these people, they came into power saying that they’re going to lower our egg prices. And here we are and we see what’s happening and we and and now and and average people right now are in disbelief that this guy is going after the pope. You know, it is that it it is going after Catholic Charities. You know, I think I think those are the conversations those are the conversations to have.
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: So my recommendation is is this and this is maybe this is a zen approach that I’m taking. I have not weighed into any primary fights at all. Like to me at this point it doesn’t matter this year. I will support whoever becomes the nominee. I will uh if it I don’t care who becomes the nominee in Maine.
Josh Klemons: Sheriff.
Murshed Zaheed: I will support that person even though I may have personal reservations about it.
Josh Klemons: Sheriff,
Murshed Zaheed: I don’t care who becomes a Yeah.
Josh Klemons: does that hold true for next cycle in Pennsylvania?

Murshed Zaheed: No.
Josh Klemons: John Federman,
Murshed Zaheed: Uh no no Fedman is the Federman is the exception.
Josh Klemons: I’ve seen you speak many times about Betterman.
Murshed Zaheed: I think Yeah.
Josh Klemons: That’s why I’m asking.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah. Yeah. Fed Federman is an exception at this point.
Josh Klemons: sure.
Murshed Zaheed: uh I don’t think that you know he he has shown his cards in terms of who in terms of
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: who he is and that that that is that that’s that’s an complete
Josh Klemons: Right.
Murshed Zaheed: exception and um but but overall I I I think I I I I don’t think anybody’s going to remember the Hasan Piker debate in October
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: or September.
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: Uh it Yeah.
Josh Klemons: It just sometimes feels like we’re running in circles. So, I’m just Yeah,
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: I was just curious like if you had like a gut reaction as someone who lived it so many times like going back to the early as it’s
Murshed Zaheed: I think I I I I think No. Yeah.

Murshed Zaheed: I think Yeah.
Josh Klemons: like we just keep doing this over and over again,
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: you know?
Murshed Zaheed: I think people who want to live run the circles I have at it. It’s like it have at it in the common threads.
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: Have at it in group chats.
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: you I think you really have to keep the focus on what’s important and and and not uh take it, you know, day uh day by

Josh Klemons: Yeah. So, in one of your pieces,
Murshed Zaheed: day.
Josh Klemons: you talked about how Harry Reid um y’all did polling of like the Daily Coast community and he was at 10%. He’s like,
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: “Great, let’s talk to him more.” So, you wrote a piece about how congressional staffers were giving up on blue sky because their bosses kept getting yelled at, which does tie directly in line with like it’s not a tactics problem,
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: it’s a strategy problem, right? It doesn’t matter how brilliant your blue sky post is. If people are mad at you voting for like election deniers for cabinet positions,
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: you’re going to get yelled at. So, your response essentially was, yeah, like let’s lean in. Let’s have those debates. Um, who do you think is doing a good job of like leaning in and like actually listening to the activists and the criticisms from the left, the right, wherever? Uh, and instead of like shying away from that
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah, I think the obvious one is Representative Alexander uh Okasia

Josh Klemons: fight.
Murshed Zaheed: Cortez. I think she she she she’s always been really brilliant about it in terms of um paying um very close attention to the discussion that’s happening online. I think she is the classic online uh she’s a very online person, right? And I think it reflects reflects through that and sometimes she will have exchanges. Uh I do wish she was engaged more on uh uh more more on blue sky than than X or she she uh I do wish she deemphasized X more in favor of other platforms. Overall, I think um I think I think she has done uh she she has done a really really good job on that front. But sadly,
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: I think she’s the only exception I can think of.
Josh Klemons: Oh, interesting.
Murshed Zaheed: I I don’t I haven’t really Oh, you know,
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: I haven’t um I I I I will say Mandani has also been really smart in terms of how he uses um his media. But thing about Mandani is he’s he’s got a strategy.

Murshed Zaheed: He’s got a core, right? He’s got a vision in terms of how he wanted to how he wants to govern and what he wants
Josh Klemons: Right.
Murshed Zaheed: to emphasize. And that’s why he always has a plan in place. And that enables him to communicate the way he does in a way that actually is authentic because that’s him, right? Uh and that that’s what it comes down to. And that’s what it comes down to
Josh Klemons: I read a thing um when Al Franken first got elected to the Senate.
Murshed Zaheed: it.
Josh Klemons: Uh he made a joke in a committee and it got a lot of news which he did. It was an accident. Like he was uncomfortable with the fact that he was like getting news for making a joke. He was trying to be a very serious person. But his team and him realized that they could use humor to get stories about issues that they cared about. So they were they became very strategic. They used comedy as a way to get press.

Josh Klemons: Um, not just by accident because he had something funny to say, but on purpose because he wanted people to focus on an issue. And I mean, it kind of goes back to like the whole like mom didn’t win his election because of his videos. He won because his videos were talking about policies people were excited about.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: He could have had equally good videos advocating for a terrible policy and nobody was going to get excited about them. Like the videos mattered, of course. like and he’s like, you know, once in a generation ability to like pull it, his team just a genius all the way down. But none of that mattered if the policy wasn’t good. And again, like Al Franken using the joke to accidentally raise awareness about something he didn’t want to talk about would be a cell phone. But recognizing, oh, I can use humor specifically to talk about important issues like you know, use every tool in your toolkit. And like um Donnie certainly done that.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.

Josh Klemons: AOC obviously before him was, you know, doing it and is still phenomenal at digital. Um, do you so you you brought up that you wish you would depp prioritize Twitter. I I still call it Twitter. You you feel free to call it whatever you want. Do you think that Dem should completely be off Twitter despite the fact that there’s an audience there or like just like depp prioritize it without disappearing completely? Like what’s your take on Twitter at this
Murshed Zaheed: really good question.
Josh Klemons: point?
Murshed Zaheed: uh you know I think uh there there is a really good recommendation and strategy on this uh and our friends at Indivisible who who by the way I love indivisible I think they are they they they do such good work.
Josh Klemons: They’re amazing for sure.
Murshed Zaheed: One of the few organizations emails I still read because I feel like I learn I learned something from
Josh Klemons: Yeah, they’re
Murshed Zaheed: them.
Josh Klemons: great.
Murshed Zaheed: But Indivisible had uh put out a paper I think it was more than a year and a half ago.

Murshed Zaheed: was called an exost strategy and I think uh it’s called the ex last
Josh Klemons: Okay,
Murshed Zaheed: strategy. If you Google indivisible exast strategy it will it will show up.
Josh Klemons: now I have to check it out.
Murshed Zaheed: Basically their argument is this and I’m going to bring it back to the raid war room like how
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: we all uh how how we how we thought about this is no I don’t recommend anybody deleting their their account on axe. I haven’t uh uh I have locked it up but I still uh I still have uh and I have deleted all my old posts but but I still have it. Uh but as an individual now if I was an organization let’s say if I if I ran an organization that that had a really strong presence on a in the past and now it’s building a presence on other platforms. I wouldn’t recommend that organization to to delete their profile and account on Axe. What I would recommend them recommend to them is to essentially diminish and phase diminish or phase it out.

Murshed Zaheed: And this is think about a comm strategy. Let’s say your organization and let’s say and and and okay, let’s say I’m going to go back. I’m going to pull back in. Let’s say I was working for Senator Reid right now and I was his communications director and we have a big press release that we’re going to drop, a big statement that’s going to uh drop. You know how I would how I would push it out? Uh that press release. I would might just first post it on Instagram, post it on uh Blue Sky,
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: then post it on threads, and then post it on Facebook. I would post it on Axe at the very end, just broadcast it. But then if somebody asked questions, I would maybe engage on Blue Sky or Instagram or Facebook on other threads. I would essentially diminish it. I would never give post original like newsy content on on on X. I would post it somewhere else. I would cross post it on X so that other people can see it.

Josh Klemons: Check.
Murshed Zaheed: I think that’s really uh that’s really that’s that I would that’s it’s a really simple approach that that is that is what’s called X last and I kind of wish Democratic cate this is where I think Democratic candidates uh Democratic leaderships they’re all failing miserably. they they they they they simply don’t seem to grasp it that they can
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: actually um take control here. I will Okay. Do you know what Drudge Report is? Right.
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: Now,
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: Drudge Report was a dominant entity in circa 2002, 2003,
Josh Klemons: They broke the they broke some big
Murshed Zaheed: 2004. Anytime something got on,
Josh Klemons: stories.
Murshed Zaheed: Democrats would cower in fear. So back in two uh when I got there, one of the things that we did um you know we started having outlets like Huffington Post that was coming up, outlets like Mother Jones and Think Progress. So I uh uh so when we had something good that we wanted to share uh we and I was having it we were having discussion like who we should share with we give it to uh Carl Holes of New York uh New York Times or whatnot.

Murshed Zaheed: like no why don’t we make news why don’t we give it to our friends in Huffington Post and give it to Nico Pittney
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: or back then Samstein and they will do it and they will do justice to it and splash it you know put it on their page and there were those were the ways that they we built up progressive start building up progressive media infrastructure back then I would suggest that’s how Democrats should should be thinking about X visa v what progressive media infrastructure means do you really have to go out and put uh post uh original new content, fresh content on axe? No. No, you don’t.
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: Would you lose anything if you don’t post it somewhere else?
Josh Klemons: All
Murshed Zaheed: You absolutely won’t. In fact, you will actually build those communities up, right? I’d rather have them uh give them an exclusive on my on my touch and and
Josh Klemons: right.
Murshed Zaheed: post it on blue sky. I rather have them, you know, in in a radical world come to your site if they have something the DPCC have something really

Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: easy to share. Come to I in my in my old job,
Josh Klemons: Invite’s always open.
Murshed Zaheed: I would find somebody like you and I I had I had done stuff like that and and
Josh Klemons: Yeah. Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: post it on a platform like this and then blast it to other reporters and that’s
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: how they should be thinking about it. But I don’t I don’t think they need to delete people need to delete their axe accounts or or go away from it.
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: But it’s a matter of strategizing and understanding what is it really important. What is it that you’re trying to build
Josh Klemons: I work a lot of campaigns and folks ask if they should be on Twitter and my take at this point is if you’re not already there,
Murshed Zaheed: up?
Josh Klemons: there’s no reason to be there. If you’ve got a following, obviously it’s a different story.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: Uh I had this one candidate that I was working with and she had a very large engaged following on Twitter and we were trying to

Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: like move folks off, but she had an engaged following. And I kept saying like she would live tweet events like sports things. And I’d be like instead of doing that on Twitter, do it on Blue Sky.
Murshed Zaheed: You
Josh Klemons: Let’s let’s try to like train people that this is where you’re hanging out. But it’s hard, you know, for a lot of folks that’s where they are. I know Cat Abu Guzle, she came on the pod, like she’s been on twice. the first time she came on specifically to talk about running a blue sky first campaign and she was depprioritizing Twitter. Exactly what you’re talking about. Like it’s not that she wasn’t posting to Twitter,
Murshed Zaheed: brilliant. She’s brilliant.
Josh Klemons: but she was started everywhere else and Twitter would be last.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: And then at some point they released they announced they were stopping on X altogether on Twitter altogether.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah. Yeah.
Josh Klemons: Um and uh so it was interesting watching her transition and obviously she didn’t win her election but damn if

Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: she didn’t build an audience. I mean, she already had an audience, but her her Blue Sky audience is bigger than almost anybody any elected official on Blue
Murshed Zaheed: Bestrun digital campaign in in this past cycle.
Josh Klemons: Sky. Yeah. And best field program. It’s It was pretty wild.
Murshed Zaheed: Uh best program.
Josh Klemons: like phenomenal digital phenomenal
Murshed Zaheed: Brilliant. I I don’t know, Cat, but if you’re listening to this, you are brilliant.
Josh Klemons: field.
Murshed Zaheed: Uh I I hope you know you were you were inspiring. You are brilliant. uh you you are I you know I I I really hope you stay engaged because textbook that’s I mean absolute textbook in terms of how
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: how she ran how uh how she ran her campaign and I really believe that’s going that that’s that’s the model and that’s the way to
Josh Klemons: Well, she actually just uh is conver my my understanding is she’s converting her campaign now into an organization that helps other campaigns do better field and field not from a traditional field like knocking on doors but actually turning it into like mutual aid hubs.

Josh Klemons: So like her office was famously like a mutual aid hub and she is continuing that now that she’s no longer running but also helping other campaigns convert their models from like these you know sort of dated models that we’ve been running uh into something a little bit more modern and fitting at the time.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: So I’m very excited to see where she goes. So I want to ask you you worked on the Dean campaign. Uh they were very cutting edge on the in the digital world like they were one of they were the first or certainly one of the first people to use email as an organizing tool. So talk to us about like how did that come about and how did we go from that to today?
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah.
Josh Klemons: Like um you don’t need to tell the full story like Josh Nelson was actually on the podcast a while back and he did kind of tell the full story but I am curious in your view like how did we how did we start so right and end so wrong and like how do we u***** where we are today?

Josh Klemons: Is that possible in your view?
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah. I I I did listen to that podcast with Josh who is doing an amazing who’s doing
Josh Klemons: Yeah, he’s great.
Murshed Zaheed: who’s doing Lord’s work in terms of trying you know uh in terms
Josh Klemons: Very good friend of the
Murshed Zaheed: of trying to make this space a better place in terms of how how folks
Josh Klemons: pod.
Murshed Zaheed: engage in this practice. Um uh in terms of the Dean campaign, uh I worked um I got there in summer of 200 three right
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: when everything was heating up and uh you know it was it it was it was interesting. The first email um I I got from the Dean campaign somebody forwarded to me. Uh it was a good friend of mine forward to me. was following them through blogs at that time because I was one of those people going to Dean blog every day because I needed I needed to read something that was anti-war and not like stuff that we were
Josh Klemons: Awesome.

Murshed Zaheed: getting in in the traditional media. But I believe vaguely that Senator Dick Cheney was in Texas like in Houston or some somewhere like for extremely pricey fundraiser. uh and and uh it you know it was it was it was so it was something ridiculous. I don’t have the exact amount but people were paying at that time like 2500 bucks so that they could have a sandwich and there was a photo of Dick Cheney eating a sandwich at this fundraiser.
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: And then I got an email from Dean Camping that after after was like, you know, we’re not going to charge you $2500 for a sandwich, but for 25 if you you know, something like if you put in if you put in 25 bucks, it is going to help us get uh you know, get to this point where we are in the campaign and send a message to the establishment that uh uh um the uh the Democrats, the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party very sick and tired of this uh this war and and I remember reading that email at that time.

Murshed Zaheed: It just felt very visceral because no, we did not get anything like that and sure enough that that email like raised like tens of hundreds of thousands of dollars at that time. Uh so uh so when I uh so it it I and at that time I knew that’s that’s kind of if I was going to work on a presidential campaign that’s where I was going to be. I had a really good friend who was working there and it was and it was not something I expected to to end up at. You know, I started out as a labor lawyer right out of law school. So, I thought I was going to work, you know,
Josh Klemons: Right.
Murshed Zaheed: work in other in Senator Joe Lieberman’s campaign or Dick Ghart’s campaign who was a big labor person. But their their position on the Iraq war essentially made it untenable for me.
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: But remember going to the Dean campaign that was very interesting is when I showed up showed up there uh my uh and uh and my boss at the time Larry Biddle.

Murshed Zaheed: So when I showed up there, it was the finance team that hired me, right? Uh the finance teams that hired me. Uh um and and it’s like I think that there’s something there here for you.
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: It’s like okay why they knew and I’m again getting into the weeds. Uh I’m a big sports fan right like I am just absolutely like one of those very online sports fan that’s in all the online communities.
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: So back in those days and I sometimes I still do. I spent a lot of times on UCLA football’s uh and basketball’s message boards following recruiting and comedy. It’s like so mad you are good with message boards. You understand how message boards work like yeah it’s like okay I think if you know if you know how to
Josh Klemons: Oh, cool.
Murshed Zaheed: moderate these forums I think there’s a job for you the dean campaign. So they h they brought me over um uh to to to essentially build
Josh Klemons: Interesting.
Murshed Zaheed: online communities for the dean campaign on message boards so that they could organize canvasers in Iowa, New Hampshire or whatnot.

Murshed Zaheed: But also then they found another job for me was to help organize house parties online. And so the the first campaign I mean real life house parties.
Josh Klemons: like real life house parties that you were organizing online. Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: Oh yeah.
Josh Klemons: Or as opposed to like online meetings.
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah. Yeah.
Josh Klemons: Got
Murshed Zaheed: No. So, so there were uh I know in the the conversation you had with Josh was Josh was mentioning
Josh Klemons: it.
Murshed Zaheed: that um you know I think you first got Dean emails because of meetups right because of the meetup tools. So that was one element of it. Meetup tools were where you just use the tools and you would get emails and show up.
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: And then there were actual house parties. A version of beatups became house where you would show up, watch like a video of a and we would like email out CDs and then everybody would like donate like $15, $20 and sometimes the parties would raise like 500 bucks,000 bucks, you know, 1,500 bucks.

Murshed Zaheed: And um so so when uh so my job was to uh work with my colleagues to organize uh h house parties who were leading their efforts and also communicate that content out via online emails or whatnot. That’s when we first started using the email. You know, obviously the email calendar had a cadence where you would have national fundraisers, but then we would do a lot of this organizing, showing up at meetups, showing up at house parties. It was the the the campaign become a blend of commun uh uh uh blend of communications that focused on organizing and fun and fundraising, right? And and it was coming with people’s authentic authentic voices.
Josh Klemons: Okay.
Murshed Zaheed: So I I believe Dean campaign uh at that time raised like like something like 50 $50 million of uh $55 million,
Josh Klemons: The grass.
Murshed Zaheed: right? Yeah. and and and and uh like and 25 of it like 30 of it like came on came out through like online donations to another and I remember the the house parties element of it like we raised like two million bucks like at at our peak in November we were organizing like 1,500 house parties around the country that you know it was it was like the first time we were using online organizing tools emails message boards, blogs, all in unison to get people out in and you know we didn’t use the term at that at the

Murshed Zaheed: time but that’s what became s the genesis of distributive organizing that you later later
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: saw like move on did fight for 15 campaign did um 10 uh 10 15 years later but I think the thing about email we we uh and you probably have this term before we used email as a as a community tool tool, right? Obviously,
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: it was a fundraising tool, but it was a community. We were talking to people, uh, writing to people in a way that we knew that our friends, our family members, our supporters were opening it and we were sending it to them not just so that they would give us money, but actually letting know what the status of the campaign is, what we’re doing, and how they can help. But I think somewhere it changed and it started with the Obama campaign in 2008,
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: right? Which was sort of a very polished version of Dean campaign. Uh Obama’s chief uh uh uh chief online person Joe Rosers came from the Dean campaign and you know but I feel like it was that when it we started losing its soul.

Murshed Zaheed: Uh, a lot of people point to uh I think when you talk to Josh, he talked about how it was Dc who really fresh sending out
Josh Klemons: Yeah, he’s he sort of pointed to like post08 like 2010 the Detroit realized that they could start
Murshed Zaheed: those
Josh Klemons: sharing emails across members and like they just had this big distributed network.
Murshed Zaheed: yeah,
Josh Klemons: Um but I mean I’m sure he would not push back too hard on what you’re saying either.
Murshed Zaheed: but no. Yeah. No, no, no, no. I think we we are what we are all we No,
Josh Klemons: I won’t speak for him but
Murshed Zaheed: no, no. I think I think we’re I’m not disagreeing with Joshu at all.
Josh Klemons: right.
Murshed Zaheed: Uh what what I’m saying is like in in my opinion if you the the changes started happening in the Obama campaign like when I would get emails from like Barack Obama that would
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: say hey you know literally in the subject line hey like that’s not Barack Obama that you clearly did not send me this email this is just a marketing gimmick you know

Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: beat me for dinner in Miami.
Josh Klemons: Yeah,
Murshed Zaheed: know that you did not send me that email, Michelle Obama. That’s when email
Josh Klemons: the Dean campaign didn’t they weren’t doing things like that.
Murshed Zaheed: I
Josh Klemons: Again, I I don’t remember being on the Dean list. I certainly was on the Obama list.
Murshed Zaheed: no we we did not we we it it
Josh Klemons: It was you weren’t trying to like make it seem like Dean was sending an email or it was more like just
Murshed Zaheed: was no.
Josh Klemons: updates from the from the world and whatnot.
Murshed Zaheed: It w it was like it was the actual staffers people who were sending the
Josh Klemons: Got
Murshed Zaheed: email who were actually writing it writing it out the sometimes we had sent
Josh Klemons: it.
Murshed Zaheed: emails guest emails from house party hosts and things like that and but I think it would I mean first of all give let’s give Obama campaign their flowers they they they were amazing right they but they they were beyond amazing but but

Josh Klemons: Amazing for sure.
Murshed Zaheed: but that’s when emails sort of took the leap from being to become a marketing
Josh Klemons: It went from like organizing and fundraising to
Murshed Zaheed: tool and just just really fundraising
Josh Klemons: fundraising.
Murshed Zaheed: marketing and and after the Obama campaign that’s where the practitioners took it right and and I think there was a rush to think about and they and it made sense that you know the all the ideas of AB testing subject lines what what come what people respond to graphics or tax or whatnot, but I think it became sort of a technocrat. It became like a tool more than anything to sort of market a candidate or an organization and and in the process that’s where I think the whole industry lost its soul that it’s now trying to trying to trying to recover, right? I I I mean um I mentioned indivisible. I think indivisible is probably one of the only organizations maybe four or five organizations whose email I actually
Josh Klemons: I I was going to ask you if you think there’s anybody using email for more than just a marketing fundraising

Murshed Zaheed: read
Josh Klemons: tool. Indivisible you brought up before. So,
Murshed Zaheed: no I I I I for me that’s really it at this
Josh Klemons: but that’s it.
Murshed Zaheed: point from the progressive orgs I I maybe maybe there are but but but that’s that’s that’s the only org right now that I that I wait maybe more than
Josh Klemons: That’s the one. Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: 25 I give it more than uh 10 seconds uh in terms of reading beyond the first
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: two paragraphs because sometimes they actually provide uh provide useful information. You know there are organizations like uh we make progress which is um congressional progressive caucuses outside organization that send really good emails for practitioners like we like in terms of what’s happening what’s happening legislatively in DC. They’re the emails that will go through the pains of under uh explain to people how reconciliation process
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: works and all that. So people like me really appreciate those emails. But but overall like um I I every other email that I that I see, they’re all about fundraising.

Murshed Zaheed: This candidate or that candidate, that’s like the direct mail trash that we would get. And I mean it email is what direct mail is.
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: Like you you see it, you don’t even open the envelope, right? You rip it. You rip the envelope, you put it in the trash.
Josh Klemons: Yep.
Murshed Zaheed: That’s what I do with that’s essentially what I do with a lot of these marketing
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: emails.
Josh Klemons: If you could snap your fingers and change one thing about our party, what would it be?
Murshed Zaheed: New leaders, new leaders with with with vision and who are fearless uh and who who are inspiring and who are not afraid.
Josh Klemons: anyone in mind or just new like is there somebody you would like uh elevate to that position
Murshed Zaheed: Um
Josh Klemons: or just
Murshed Zaheed: the the only guy that’s giving me life right now is the pope.
Josh Klemons: new?
Murshed Zaheed: You know,
Josh Klemons: He is American born.
Murshed Zaheed: it’s look look how fearless he is.
Josh Klemons: He could be president I guess.

Josh Klemons: He is careless.
Murshed Zaheed: And I’m not a Catholic who is fear but you know all his communication
Josh Klemons: Yeah.
Murshed Zaheed: actually this is really interesting Josh I I’m fascinated by the way he he is communicating right now. He clearly has a core core convict set of convictions and he’s
Josh Klemons: Mhm.
Murshed Zaheed: comm he has this trip in Africa and the way he’s communicating he’s running circles around the Trump
Josh Klemons: Oh yeah,
Murshed Zaheed: regime brilliantly eloquently with class and grace.
Josh Klemons: for sure.
Murshed Zaheed: Um and there’s something to be said there and he’s meeting and you know what he’s meeting his core objectives because the uh people of the conversion rate to Catholicism is through the roof right now.
Josh Klemons: Yeah, I would imagine Catholicism is popular at the
Murshed Zaheed: It is it’s it’s it’s it’s very
Josh Klemons: moment.
Murshed Zaheed: popular and I think I think people can learn from that is you know and Pope is popular on in my in probably because I like a couple of things from Pope but my Instagram reel is like
Josh Klemons: It’s just blowing up.

Murshed Zaheed: is feed is it is blowing up with Pope stuff with funny memes and but but but it’s
Josh Klemons: That’s awesome.
Murshed Zaheed: be it it goes back to the core conviction strategy uh people who have it. People who have them generally tend to be tend to do well.
Josh Klemons: Sure.
Murshed Zaheed: And I think that’s I think it would be good to have really good to have strong leaders uh that that embody
Josh Klemons: Okay. No, I love it.
Murshed Zaheed: that.
Josh Klemons: Uh, how can folks keep in touch with you moving forward? I know you’re on Blue Sky and where else you hanging out that uh folks can find you,
Murshed Zaheed: I think that’s probably I mean I’m on LinkedIn I suppose uh LinkedIn I I I am there
Josh Klemons: Blue Sky. Okay,
Murshed Zaheed: prof in terms of all the professional folks I mean I’m there I’m pretty pretty pretty engaged there but before we
Josh Klemons: cool.
Murshed Zaheed: even um do that I don’t think I I mentioned this Josh uh I I I forgot to note my gratitude to you for having me on the show uh

Josh Klemons: Out. Of course. Happy to have you, man.
Murshed Zaheed: it’s at the yeah needed to
Josh Klemons: A long time
Murshed Zaheed: uh make sure if if there’s a way I hope you can notice that and note this at the end or at
Josh Klemons: coming.
Murshed Zaheed: the beginning because really grateful for you to you uh for having me on the show. I’m really grateful to you uh for how you’re going about this stuff in terms of having this conversations. so important, so thoughtful. Uh there there needs to be really more of this uh in in our spaces, our our uh I think it it does a lot of good. It does a lot of good for our spaces um and the world of advocacy, which in turn does a lot of good for our communities and the country. So so so so grateful to you for that and honored for be
Josh Klemons: I’m humbled uh to have such praise.
Murshed Zaheed: here.
Josh Klemons: I started this podcast because I desperately wanted to uh learn from smarter people than me. Uh and a podcast is a great way to get them to come talk to you. Um but yeah, I know like I have, you know, I hear from folks regularly that they also are learning so much from the folks that come on. So, uh I’m very, um I love this podcast. I love getting to do it and I really appreciate you making the time to come
Murshed Zaheed: Yeah,
Josh Klemons: on.
Murshed Zaheed: thank you so much.

April 22, 2026/0 Comments/by Josh Klemons
https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Murshed-Zaheed-Democrats-dont-have-a-tactics-problem.-We-have-a-strategy-problem.jpg 1080 1080 Josh Klemons https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Reverbal-Communications-Josh-Klemons.svg Josh Klemons2026-04-22 15:15:262026-04-22 15:15:27Democrats Don’t Have a Tactics Problem. We Have a Strategy Problem. With Murshed Zaheed | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 52
Politics

Trump’s Role in the Debates

This post originally ran on Tumblr.

I was once asked by a political campaign to help their candidate with debate prep. Along with my candidate, there were several very intelligent, articulate and qualified candidates running. And then there was Robert (not his real name). That’s where I came in.

Robert was a one-issue candidate. He did not have a website, a social media presence, a staff or a platform. What he did have was a single economic idea, though it was not particularly well-thought out, specific or even implementable, given the powers of the office he was seeking. He also had a penchant for the bizarre.

He had run for numerous offices in the past, never making a dent in the polling or the final vote tally. But he had secured enough signatures to run this time around, and he was going to be in the debates.

My campaign had a problem: How do you prep for a debate — a real debate against smart and competent opponents — while also preparing for the absurdity that Robert was sure to bring to the table?

The answer: they asked me to put on my best chaos hat and do my damnedest to throw the candidate off.

I watched every tape I could find of Robert. I transcribed long, rambling speeches and statements. I scoured the internet for his musings, and in the end, I played Robert throughout the debate prep process, in all his oddness and glory.

In keeping to form, I alternated wildly between silent and verbose, between deferential and outright rude. No matter what the question, I pivoted to my single idea. It didn’t matter if the subject was gay marriage, taxes or education, I was going to talk about one thing: my idea.

Throughout prep, I went out of my way to ensure that the candidate could never know what to expect. At times I sided with him, forcing him into a corner by appearing to be an ally (remember when Brandi Maxxxx, the local Pawnee porn star, kept pulling that on Leslie Knope during her city council debates?). At times I spoke almost literal nonsense (often pulled directly from statements Robert had given in previous speeches or debates). At other times, I belittled the candidate in a way that was uncomfortable for everyone in the room. But it was my job. No angle — however hostile or awkward — was left unexplored.

In the end, the campaign decided that there was little choice but to ignore Robert, no matter what he said or did. When it was time for the real debates, this helped keep my candidate’s performance steady, even as the evenings invariably took strange turns.

Robert was polling at less than 1%. But he had the time to stand in front of grocery stores and gas stations collecting signatures from people who just didn’t care enough to say no. This had secured him a place on the ballot, and thus a spot in the debates.

What if, instead of preparing to debate Robert, the campaign had needed to prepare to debate a world-famous celebrity, one worth TEN BILLION DOLLARS (allegedly)? What if this celebrity’s primary issue excited the base and any disrespect shown to him — whether through disagreement or sidelining — was an affront that he would never ignore or forgive? What if it was all but guaranteed that the stories written about the debate the next day would inevitably be about him, and how everyone else had interacted with him?

Well, I’m not sure what the strategy would be then. I just know I wouldn’t want to be an adviser to Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker or anyone else preparing for a debate with someone like that.

The point is, Robert should never have been in the debates. He took up precious time. He meant well, certainly, but he lowered the level of discourse. No matter what the topic, he made the conversation less thoughtful and nuanced. In the lead-up to this week’s Fox News debate, I have been thinking a lot about Robert.

Donald Trump has a website, a social media presence, a staff and a platform (sort of). Mostly he just has money. A lot of money.

But for Trump, every issue is black and white. People who don’t agree with him are “dummies” or “losers.” He has ideas, but no plans (Mexico isn’t going to pay for the wall, and he can’t bring jobs back to America when he doesn’t even produce his own goods here). He talks ad nauseam about “the Mexicans,” “the Chinese” and “the Saudis.” He tells us constantly how they’re beating us, that he likes them, that he sells them condos. It’s nonsense, on endless repeat. There are no statistics or facts, there isn’t even really a proposal.

He wrote the Art of the Deal. He’s worth a lot of money. He’s loved by many people. These refrains seem to be the heart of his campaign.

How is the GOP going to have an honest debate about the particulars of the Iran Deal when Donald Trump is taking all the oxygen from the stage simply repeating the fact that he is the world’s best negotiator, so of course he could have done it better.

When they talk about immigration, he’ll talk about building a wall. How can Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio hope to discuss real plans?

He loves the vets and he’s going to be the best President there has ever been to them. I support that 100%. But what does that mean? How can Scott Walker articulate a proposal to fix the VA while Trump is controlling the conversation simply by being angry about it?

Elections are hard. They take passion. But they’re also about ideas.

Donald Trump has passion. But he doesn’t seem to have any real ideas. What he does have is our attention. And come Thursday, he is going to be on stage, ensuring that the Republicans vying for their party’s nomination don’t actually talk about anything.

Even Robert is out there somewhere, yelling at his television, wondering what the hell Donald is talking about.

August 1, 2015/0 Comments/by Josh Klemons
https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Reverbal-Communications-Josh-Klemons.svg 0 0 Josh Klemons https://joshklemons.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Reverbal-Communications-Josh-Klemons.svg Josh Klemons2015-08-01 07:24:482023-07-06 12:55:51Trump’s Role in the Debates

Categories

  • Brand Management
  • Digital Ads
  • Digital Marketing
  • Digital Tools
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Gmail
  • Hello Merge Tag
  • Instagram
  • iPhone Functionality
  • Politics
  • Republican Email Tracking
  • SEO
  • Social Media
  • Step Up Your Social
  • TikTok
  • Twitter
  • Uncategorized
  • Wisconsin

Recent Posts

  • Turning Followers Into Voters with Erika Harrison of Black Girls Who Brunch and Claire Shorall of Sway | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 55
  • Stop Thinking About Persuasion. Start With The Bedrock Approach.
  • Are Democrats Ready for Our First Truly AI Election? with Jack Welty | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 53
  • Democrats Don’t Have a Tactics Problem. We Have a Strategy Problem. With Murshed Zaheed | Hello Merge Tag Ep. 52
  • 10 Reasons Publer is My Go-To Tool for Social Media Management in 2026

We’ve got loads of content to help you step up your digital marketing

Check It Out

Ready to take your digital marketing to the next level? We have free checklists for you

Download Them Today

Get social media tips, tricks, hacks and strategies delivered directly to your inbox

Sign Up Today
Contact

info@reverbalcommunications.com

Privacy Policy

Social Media, Digital Marketing, Digital Strategy, Training, Consulting, ​Facebook Ads, Political Campaign Consultant, Keynote Speaker
Based in Madison, Wisconsin. Serving the world.

Get In Touch
  • info@reverbalcommunications.com

Based in Madison, Wisconsin. Serving the world.

Quick Links

  • Why Us
  • Politics
  • Speaking
  • Consulting
  • About
  • Blog +

Get social media tips, tricks, hacks and strategies delivered directly to your inbox

Sign Up Today

© 2025 Reverbal Communications. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Tiktok
Substack update
Threads new update

© 2022 All rights reserved. | WordPress Web Design by Bizzy Bizzy
    Scroll to top

    This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

    OKLearn more×

    Cookie and Privacy Settings



    How we use cookies

    We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

    Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

    Essential Website Cookies

    These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

    Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

    We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

    We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

    Google Analytics Cookies

    These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

    If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

    Other external services

    We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

    Google Webfont Settings:

    Google Map Settings:

    Google reCaptcha Settings:

    Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

    Other cookies

    The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

    Privacy Policy

    You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

    Terms and Conditions
    Accept settingsHide notification only